The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Oxygen Vacancies Activate CO2 Dissociation on TiO2 Anatase (001)
Abstract
The adsorption, dissociation, and diffusion of CO 2 on the anatase (001) surface was studied using DFT by means of the generalized gradient approximation using the Perdew–Burcke–Ernzerhof (PBE)-functional and applying corrections for long-range dispersion interactions. Different stable adsorption configurations were identified for the fully oxidized surface. The most stable adsorption configuration is the monodentated carbonate-like structure. Small energy barriers were identified for the conversion of a physisorbed to a chemisorbed configuration. CO 2 dissociation is found to be unfeasible on the stoichiometric surface. The introduction of oxygen vacancy defects gives rise to new highly stable adsorption configurations with a stronger activation of the C–O bonds. This leads to the possibility of exothermic dissociation of CO 2 with barriers up to 22.2 kcal/mol, corresponding to chemical lifetimes of less than 4 s at 300 K. These reactions cause a CO molecule to be formed, which will easily desorb, and the reduced surface to become oxidized. It is clear that oxygen vacancy defects play a key role in the catalytic activity of an anatase (001) surface. Oxygen vacancies play an important role in the dissociation of CO 2 on the anatase (001) surface, and will play a significant role in complex problems, such as the catalytic conversion of CO 2 to value-added chemicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Oreskes, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103618 · Cited by 1,814
Cited by
Tuning Selectivity of CO2 Hydrogenation Reactions at the Metal/Oxide Interface
Kattel, S., Liu, P., & Chen, J. G. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05362 · Cited by 1,259
Liu, B., Li, C., Zhang, G., Yao, X., Chuang, S. S. C., & Li, Z. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00415 · Cited by 668
Oxygen vacancies in metal oxides: recent progress towards advanced catalyst design
Zhuang, G., Chen, Y., Zhuang, Z., Yu, Y., & Yu, J. (2020) · Science China Materials · doi:10.1007/s40843-020-1305-6 · Cited by 499
Impacts of the Catalyst Structures on CO2 Activation on Catalyst Surfaces
Etim, U. J., Zhang, C., & Zhong, Z. (2021) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11123265 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Huygh, S., Bogaerts, A., & Neyts, E. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-09-14
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 21659-21669
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2512001963
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.