Cited by 56Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

Zeolites ZSM-25 and PST-20: Selective Carbon Dioxide Adsorbents at High Pressures

Min, Jung Gi, Kemp, K. Christian, Hong, Suk Bong·2017·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Natural gas upgrading requires the separation of its major components, predominantly CH 4 and CO 2, at the high pressures found at the wellhead. Here we demonstrate that the Na + -tetraethylammonium form of ZSM-25 and PST-20, the fourth and fifth generations of the RHO family of zeolites with embedded isoreticular structures, can be efficiently employed to separate CO 2 from CH 4 over a wide temperature and pressure range (298–373 K and 0–25 bar). Both zeolites exhibit impressive CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity (>20) at 298 K and 25 bar, relatively large adsorption capacity (4.0 and 3.6 mmol g –1, respectively) even at 373 K and 25 bar, and long-term durability even in the presence of H 2 O. These superior separation properties could be linked to the limited framework flexibilities of ZSM-25 and PST-20 mainly arising from the larger ratio of embedded to scaffold cages in the higher generation of the RHO family.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11582

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CO2 adsorption on RHO and related zeolites involves simultaneous cation relocation and structure change.

    “Another interesting case, in which cation relocation and structure change take place simultaneously, is that of CO2 adsorption on RHO and related zeolites.”
  • Promising values of CO2/CH4 selectivity and heat of adsorption of CO2 have been obtained using medium-, high-, and pure-silica LTA, RHO, MWF, PWN, FAU, CHA, AEI, STT, and RRO zeolites and AlPOs/SAPOs with CHA, RHO, AFX, AFN, and AEI structures.

    “Promising values of CO2/CH4 selectivity and heat of adsorption of CO2 have been obtained using medium-, high-, and pure-silica LTA,501 RHO,273 MWF, PWN275,502 (and other RHO-related structures), FAU,483 CHA,503 AEI, STT, and RRO504 zeolites and aluminophosphates (AlPOs) and silicoaluminophosphates (SAPOs) with CHA, RHO, AFX, AFN, and AEI structures.152,505−508”
  • In RHO and RHO-related structures, selectivity is enhanced by structural changes in framework and cation relocation upon CO2 adsorption; these changes and trapdoor effects do not take place upon CH4 adsorption, leading to extremely high selectivities.

    “In the case of RHO and RHO-related structures, the selectivity is enhanced by structural changes in the framework and in cation relocation upon CO2 adsorption.261,263,273−275,502,512−515 These structural changes and trapdoor effects do not take place upon CH4 adsorption, which leads to extremely high selectivities.”
  • Materials such as SAPO-RHO (RHO), NaTEA-PST-20, Li-SSZ-13-6, Na-SSZ-13-6 (CHA), or SAPO-56 (AFX) present promising values of selectivities (>10) and working capacities (ca. 0.5 mmol/g) at relevant conditions, comparable with traditional 5A and 13X zeolites.

    “Materials, such as SAPO-RHO (RHO),507 NaTEA-PST-20,275 Li-SSZ-13–6, Na-SSZ-13–6 (CHA),555 or SAPO-56 (AFX)507 present promising values of selectivities (>10) and working capacities (ca. 0.5 mmol/g) at relevant conditions, comparable with those of traditional 5A521 and 13X522 zeolites.”
  • Other materials with lower polarity, such as high- and pure-silica zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs, minimize water adsorption and energy required for regeneration, while keeping promising selectivities and working capacities in some cases.

    “Other materials with lower polarity, such as high- and pure-silica zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs, minimize water adsorption and the energy required for regeneration, while keeping promising selectivities and working capacities in some cases.275,276,333,502,507,547,554−559”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Min, J. G., Kemp, K. C., & Hong, S. B.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Hong, Suk Bong
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
121
Issue
6
Pages
3404-3409
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2581782122
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2012R1A3A-2048833)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
CO2/CH4 separation, CO2 adsorption, natural gas upgrading, high-pressure gas separation, CO2/CH4 selectivity, framework flexibility, water resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review