Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,564

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices

Mei, Bing-Ang, Munteshari, Obaidallah, Lau, Jonathan, Dunn, Bruce, Pilon, Laurent·2018·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) consists of plotting so-called Nyquist plots representing negative of the imaginary versus the real parts of the complex impedance of individual electrodes or electrochemical cells. To date, interpretations of Nyquist plots have been based on physical intuition and/or on the use of equivalent RC circuits. However, the resulting interpretations are not unique and have often been inconsistent in the literature. This study aims to provide unequivocal physical interpretations of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results for electric double layer capacitor (EDLC) electrodes and devices. To do so, a physicochemical transport model was used for numerically reproducing Nyquist plots accounting for (i) electric double layer (EDL) formation at the electrode/electrolyte interface, (ii) charge transport in the electrode, and (iii) ion electrodiffusion in binary and symmetric electrolytes. Typical Nyquist plots of EDLC electrodes were reproduced numerically for different electrode conductivity and thickness, electrolyte domain thickness, as well as ion diameter, diffusion coefficient, and concentrations. The electrode resistance, electrolyte resistance, and the equilibrium differential capacitance were identified from Nyquist plots without relying on equivalent RC circuits. The internal resistance retrieved from the numerically generated Nyquist plots was comparable to that retrieved from the “IR drop” in numerically simulated galvanostatic cycling. Furthermore, EIS simulations were performed for EDLC devices, and similar interpretations of Nyquist plots were obtained. Finally, these results and interpretations were confirmed experimentally using EDLC devices consisting of two identical activated-carbon electrodes in both aqueous and nonaqueous electrolytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,564

Metadata

Authors
Mei, B.-A., Munteshari, O., Lau, J., Dunn, B., & Pilon, L.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2017-12-28
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
194-206
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2775221995
Cited by
1,564
References
0
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582
The paper
Mei, B.-A., Munteshari, O., Lau, J., Dunn, B., & Pilon, L. (2018). Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.