The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices
Abstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) consists of plotting so-called Nyquist plots representing negative of the imaginary versus the real parts of the complex impedance of individual electrodes or electrochemical cells. To date, interpretations of Nyquist plots have been based on physical intuition and/or on the use of equivalent RC circuits. However, the resulting interpretations are not unique and have often been inconsistent in the literature. This study aims to provide unequivocal physical interpretations of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results for electric double layer capacitor (EDLC) electrodes and devices. To do so, a physicochemical transport model was used for numerically reproducing Nyquist plots accounting for (i) electric double layer (EDL) formation at the electrode/electrolyte interface, (ii) charge transport in the electrode, and (iii) ion electrodiffusion in binary and symmetric electrolytes. Typical Nyquist plots of EDLC electrodes were reproduced numerically for different electrode conductivity and thickness, electrolyte domain thickness, as well as ion diameter, diffusion coefficient, and concentrations. The electrode resistance, electrolyte resistance, and the equilibrium differential capacitance were identified from Nyquist plots without relying on equivalent RC circuits. The internal resistance retrieved from the numerically generated Nyquist plots was comparable to that retrieved from the “IR drop” in numerically simulated galvanostatic cycling. Furthermore, EIS simulations were performed for EDLC devices, and similar interpretations of Nyquist plots were obtained. Finally, these results and interpretations were confirmed experimentally using EDLC devices consisting of two identical activated-carbon electrodes in both aqueous and nonaqueous electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards establishing standard performance metrics for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond
Noori, A., El-Kady, M. F., Rahmanifar, M. S., Kaner, R. B., & Mousavi, M. F. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00581h · Cited by 1,303
Artificial multimodal receptors based on ion relaxation dynamics
You, I., Mackanic, D. G., Matsuhisa, N., Kang, J., Kwon, J., Beker, L., Mun, J., Suh, W., Kim, T. Y., Tok, J. B.-H., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba5132 · Cited by 632
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
Zhao, W., Xu, T., Li, T., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Feng, J., Ding, S., Li, Z., & Wu, M. (2018) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201802829 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Mei, B.-A., Munteshari, O., Lau, J., Dunn, B., & Pilon, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-12-28
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 194-206
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2775221995
- Cited by
- 1,564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582
- The paper
- Mei, B.-A., Munteshari, O., Lau, J., Dunn, B., & Pilon, L. (2018). Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.