The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best Practice in Photocatalysis: Comparing Rates or Apparent Quantum Yields?
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTBest Practice in Photocatalysis: Comparing Rates or Apparent Quantum Yields?Horst Kisch*† and Detlef Bahnemann*‡§View Author Information† Department Chemie and Pharmazie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 1, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany‡ Institut für Technische Chemie, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Callinstraße 3, D-30167 Hannover, Germany§ Laboratory for Nanocomposite Materials, Department of Photonics, Faculty of Physics, Saint-Petersburg State University, Ulianovskaia str. 3, Peterhof, Saint-Petersburg, 198504, Russia*E-mail: [email protected]*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 10, 1907–1910Publication Date (Web):May 21, 2015Publication History Accepted30 April 2015Published online21 May 2015Published inissue 21 May 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00521https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00521editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views13816Altmetric-Citations220LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (457 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Light,Light absorption,Photocatalysis,Photocatalysts,Quantum yield Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis
Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00033a004 · Cited by 18,495
Self-citation
Cited by
Updates on the Roadmap for Photocatalysis
Melchionna, M., & Fornasiero, P. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c01204 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Kisch, H., & Bahnemann, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-05-21
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1907-1910
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2289094291
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best Practice in Photocatalysis: Comparing Rates or Apparent Quantum Yields? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00521
- The paper
- Kisch, H., & Bahnemann, D. (2015). Best Practice in Photocatalysis: Comparing Rates or Apparent Quantum Yields? The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
