Time-Resolved Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect of Magnetic Thin Films for Ultrafast Thermal Characterization
Abstract
Thermomagnetic and magneto-optical effects are two fundamental but unique phenomena existing in magnetic materials. In this work, we demonstrate ultrafast time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect (TR-MOKE) as an advanced thermal characterization technique by studying the original factors of the MOKE signal from four magnetic transducers, including TbFe, GdFeCo, Co/Pd, and CoFe/Pt. A figure of merit is proposed to evaluate the performance of the transducer layers, corresponding to the degree of the signal-to-noise ratio in TR-MOKE measurements. We observe improved figure of merit for rare-earth transition-metal-based TbFe and GdFeCo transducers and attribute this improvement to their relatively larger temperature-dependent magnetization and the Kerr rotation angle at the saturated magnetization state. Furthermore, an optimal thickness of TbFe is found to be ∼18.5 nm to give the best performance. Our findings will facilitate the nanoscale thermal characterization and the device design where the thermo-magneto-optical coupling plays an important role.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TDTR can incorporate a temperature sensing technique utilizing time-resolved magneto-optic Kerr effect (TR-MOKE).
“TDTR can also incorporate a novel temperature sensing technique utilizing time-resolved magneto-optic Kerr effect (TR-MOKE). 34, 149, 150”
From Tutorial: Time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) for thermal property characterization of bulk and thin film materials (2018) · cites this paper as [149]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Chen, J.-Y., Zhu, J., Zhang, D., Lattery, D. M., Li, M., Wang, J.-P., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xiaojia
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-06-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2328-2332
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2409156894
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51206167, 51336009)
- National Science Foundation (1420013)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Magnetic properties of thin films
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
- Keywords
- time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect, magnetic thin films, thermomagnetic effects, magneto-optical effect, GdFeCo, figure of merit, signal-to-noise ratio, temperature dependence of magnetization, Kerr rotation angle, rare earth-transition metal alloys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review