The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Directly Probing Charge Separation at Interface of TiO2 Phase Junction
Abstract
Phase junction is often recognized as an effective strategy to achieve efficient charge separation in photocatalysis and photochemistry. As a crucial factor to determine the photogenerated charges dynamics, there is an increasingly hot debate about the energy band alignment across the interface of phase junction. Herein, we reported the direct measurement of the surface potential profile over the interface of TiO 2 phase junction. A built-in electric field up to 1 kV/cm from rutile to anatase nanoparticle was detected by Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM). Home-built spatially resolved surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SRSPS) supplies a direct evidence for the vectorial charge transfer of photogenerated electrons from rutile to anatase. Moreover, the tunable anatase nanoparticle sizes in TiO 2 phase junction leads to high surface photovoltage (SPV) by creating completely depleted space charge region (SCR) and enhancing the charge separation efficiency. The results provide a strong basis for understanding the impact of built-in electric field on the charge transfer across the interface of artificial photocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., & Thurnauer, M. C. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0273934 · Cited by 2,015
Cited by
Generation and Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species in Photocatalysis
Nosaka, Y., & Nosaka, A. Y. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161 · Cited by 4,771
Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalysts for solar-driven overall water splitting
Wang, Z., Li, C., & Domen, K. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00542g · Cited by 2,295
Self-citationRecent advances and perspectives for solar-driven water splitting using particulate photocatalysts
Tao, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Li, C., & Li, R. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs01182k · Cited by 871
Self-citationChen, R., Fan, F., Dittrich, T., & Li, C. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00320c · Cited by 586
Self-citationLi, C., Cao, Q., Wang, F., Xiao, Y., Li, Y., Delaunay, J.-J., & Zhu, H. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00067k · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Y., Zhu, J., An, H., Yan, P., Huang, B., Chen, R., Fan, F., & Li, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-03-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1419-1423
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2596569367
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.