Cited by 70Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials ResearchTopological Materials and PhenomenaGraphene research and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Honeycomb Boron Allotropes with Dirac Cones: A True Analogue to Graphene

Yi, Wen-cai, Liu, Wei, Botana, Jorge, Zhao, Lei, Liu, Zhen, Liu, Jing-yao, Miao, Mao-sheng·2017·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Abstract

We propose a series of planar boron allotropes with honeycomb topology and demonstrate that their band structures exhibit Dirac cones at the K point, the same as graphene. In particular, the Dirac point of one honeycomb boron sheet locates precisely on the Fermi level, rendering it as a topologically equivalent material to graphene. Its Fermi velocity ( v f ) is 6.05 × 10 5 m/s, close to that of graphene. Although the freestanding honeycomb B allotropes are higher in energy than α-sheet, our calculations show that a metal substrate can greatly stabilize these new allotropes. They are actually more stable than α-sheet sheet on the Ag(111) surface. Furthermore, we find that the honeycomb borons form low-energy nanoribbons that may open gaps or exhibit strong ferromagnetism at the two edges in contrast to the antiferromagnetic coupling of the graphene nanoribbon edges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00891

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chiral borophene lattice configuration has been calculated to be stable as a planar sheet of boron atoms.

    “This configuration has been calculated to be stable as a planar sheet of boron atoms [20,21].”

    From Pseudospin-2 in photonic chiral borophene (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.105 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/jacs.5b10917 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature04235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nature08582 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.086804 · DOI
  6. 10.1039/C3NR04463G · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02512 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09960 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.155501 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.035432 · DOI
  11. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/095002 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nsr/nwu080 · DOI
  13. 10.1039/C4NR01846J · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nchem.1999 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.166804 · DOI
  16. 10.1039/C4NR06026A · DOI
  17. 10.1021/nl0498785 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.115501 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/jacs.6b12750 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/nn302696v · DOI
  21. 10.1021/jp305545z · DOI
  22. 10.1039/C5NR04359J · DOI
  23. 10.1002/ange.201505425 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04180 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00070 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085406 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nature07736 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/ja0026962 · DOI
  29. 10.1039/C6CP05405F · DOI
  30. 10.1002/anie.201207972 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/nl3004754 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/ange.201509285 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nchem.2491 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.aad1080 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.085502 · DOI
  36. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05292 · DOI
  37. He, X. L.; Weng, X. J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z. S.; Wang, Z. H.; Xu, B.; Oganov, A. R.; Tian, Y. J.; Zhou, X. F.; Wang, H. T.Two-dimensional boron on Pb (110) surface. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.00257. · arXiv
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.096401 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00452 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1063/1.1564060 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115412 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.11009 · DOI
  46. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/023004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yi, W.-C., Liu, W., Botana, J., Zhao, L., Liu, Z., Liu, J.-Y., & Miao, M.-S.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, PR China
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, California State University, Northridge, California 91330-8262, United States
Corresponding author
Liu, Jing-yao
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
2647-2653
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618322519
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (20973077, 21373098)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
Dirac cones, graphene analogues, boron sheets, electronic band structure, Fermi velocity, Ag(111), nanoribbons, band gap opening, topological equivalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review