To Fly, or Not to Fly, That Is the Question: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Detectability Prediction in Mass Spectrometry
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Identifying detectable peptides, known as flyers, is key in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Peptide detectability is strongly related with the peptide sequence and its resulting physicochemical properties. Moreover, the high variability in MS data, particularly in peptide detectability and intensity across multiple analyses and samples, makes the development of a generic model for detectability prediction unfeasible. This underlines the need for tools that can be refined for specific experimental conditions. To address this need, we present Pfly, a deep learning model developed to predicts peptide detectability based solely on peptide sequence. Pfly distinguishes itself as a versatile and reliable state-of-the-art tool, offering high performance, accessibility, and easy customizability for end-users. This adaptability allows researchers to tailor the model to their specific experimental conditions, facilitating the creation of lab-specific models. This, in turn, can lead to more accurate results and expand the model’s applicability across various research fields. The model’s architecture is an encoder-decoder with an attention mechanism. This tool classifies peptides as either flyers or non-flyers, providing both binary probabilities and detailed categorical probabilities for four distinct classes defined in this study: non-flyer, weak flyer, intermediate flyer, and strong flyer. The model was initially trained on a synthetic peptide library and subsequently fine-tuned with a biological dataset to mitigate bias towards synthesizability, improving the predictive capacity and outperforming state-of-the-art predictors in a benchmark comparison. The study further investigates the influence of protein abundance and the search engine, illustrating the negative impact on peptide identification due to misclassification. Pfly has been integrated in the DLOmix framework and it is accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/wilhelm-lab/dlomix .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Michalski, A., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr101060v · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Quantifying the local adaptive landscape of a nascent bacterial community
Ascensao, J. A., Wetmore, K. M., Good, B. H., Arkin, A. P., & Hallatschek, O. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35677-5 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics
HUPO Test Sample Working Group, Bell, A. W., Deutsch, E. W., Au, C. E., Kearney, R. E., Beavis, R., Sechi, S., Nilsson, T., & Bergeron, J. J. M. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1333 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Vesper, H. W., Bhasin, S., Wang, C., Tai, S. S., Dodge, L. A., Singh, R. J., Nelson, J., Ohorodnik, S., Clarke, N. J., Salameh, W. A., et al. (2009) · Steroids · doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2009.01.004 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Metrics for the Human Proteome Project 2013–2014 and Strategies for Finding Missing Proteins
Lane, L., Bairoch, A., Beavis, R. C., Deutsch, E. W., Gaudet, P., Lundberg, E., & Omenn, G. S. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr401144x · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Abdul-Khalek, N., Picciani, M., Shouman, O., Wimmer, R., Overgaard, M. T., Wilhelm, M., & Gregersen Echers, S.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Department of Chemistry and Bioscience
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-05-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2709-2726
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- PMC
- PMC12150320
- OpenAlex
- W4410225224
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung (031L0305A)
- European Research Council (101077037)
- Elitenetzwerk Bayern (F-6-M5613.6.K-NW-2021-411/1/1)
- Karl Pedersens og Hustrus Industrifond (DI-201907020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- flyers, deep learning, attention mechanism, encoder-decoder architecture, peptide sequences, synthetic peptide libraries, fine-tuning, protein abundance, rescoring, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, peptide identification
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Humans, Peptides, Software, Mass Spectrometry, Peptide Library, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review