Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Use of Variable Q1 Isolation Windows Improves Selectivity in LC–SWATH–MS Acquisition

Zhang, Ying, Bilbao, Aivett, Bruderer, Tobias, Luban, Jeremy, Strambio-De-Castillia, Caterina, Lisacek, Frédérique, Hopfgartner, Gérard, Varesio, Emmanuel·2015·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

As tryptic peptides and metabolites are not equally distributed along the mass range, the probability of cross fragment ion interference is higher in certain windows when fixed Q1 SWATH windows are applied. We evaluated the benefits of utilizing variable Q1 SWATH windows with regards to selectivity improvement. Variable windows based on equalizing the distribution of either the precursor ion population (PIP) or the total ion current (TIC) within each window were generated by an in-house software, swathTUNER. These two variable Q1 SWATH window strategies outperformed, with respect to quantification and identification, the basic approach using a fixed window width (FIX) for proteomic profiling of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs). Thus, 13.8 and 8.4% additional peptide precursors, which resulted in 13.1 and 10.0% more proteins, were confidently identified by SWATH using the strategy PIP and TIC, respectively, in the MDDC proteomic sample. On the basis of the spectral library purity score, some improvement warranted by variable Q1 windows was also observed, albeit to a lesser extent, in the metabolomic profiling of human urine. We show that the novel concept of "scheduled SWATH" proposed here, which incorporates (i) variable isolation windows and (ii) precursor retention time segmentation further improves both peptide and metabolite identifications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00543

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Bilbao, A., Bruderer, T., Luban, J., Strambio-De-Castillia, C., Lisacek, F., Hopfgartner, G., & Varesio, E.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2015-09-03
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
4359-4371
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1165322719
Cited by
193
References
5
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Variable Q1 Isolation Windows Improves Selectivity in LC–SWATH–MS Acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00543
The paper
Zhang, Y., Bilbao, A., Bruderer, T., Luban, J., Strambio-De-Castillia, C., Lisacek, F., Hopfgartner, G., & Varesio, E. (2015). The Use of Variable Q1 Isolation Windows Improves Selectivity in LC–SWATH–MS Acquisition. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.