Cited by 1Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Evaluation of PE5 Entries on the Human Proteome Project Target List

Open access
Zheng, Clarissa, Andken, Marie, Mudge, Jonathan M., Magrane, Michele, Orchard, Sandra, Sun, Zhi, Deutsch, Eric W.·2025·Journal of Proteome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

One aim of the international Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Human Proteome Project (HPP) is to obtain high-confidence translation evidence for every human protein-coding gene established in its target list of 19,433 entries based on the protein-coding genes from Ensembl-GENCODE. However, 76 are annotated in UniProtKB (as of release 2024_06) with PE5, indicating skepticism in the protein's existence from a manual curator, so it is unclear if these entries belong in the HPP target list. Here, we review these 76 entries by assembling evidence from the literature, reference databases, and genome alignments with other species to conclude whether these entries should be freed from their PE5 status to become annotated with PE1-4 in UniProtKB. We find that 17 of these have credible translation evidence and therefore should be upgraded to PE1. Another 15 lack translation evidence but have transcription evidence, the evolutionary hallmarks of protein-coding genes, and are presumed to produce functional proteins. 41 have no translational or transcriptional evidence, although they still bear the evolutionary hallmarks of protein-coding genes; currently, it remains unclear if these are protein-coding, so their representation becomes a matter of policy. Only 3 entries still seem best categorized as PE5 and excluded from the HUPO-HPP target list.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00167

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zheng, C., Andken, M., Mudge, J. M., Magrane, M., Orchard, S., Sun, Z., & Deutsch, E. W.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Systems Biology (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Deutsch, Eric W.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2025-06-12
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
3507-3533
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W4411241263
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U24HG007234)
  • Wellcome Trust (WT222155/Z/20/Z)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM087221, R24 GM148372)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
Human Proteome Project, human protein-coding genes
MeSH terms
Humans, Proteome, Databases, Protein, Proteomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review