Cited by 101Icing and De-icing TechnologiesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicitynanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Passive Anti-Icing and Active Electrothermal Deicing System Based on an Ultraflexible Carbon Nanowire (CNW)/PDMS Biomimetic Nanocomposite with a Superhydrophobic Microcolumn Surface

Abstract

The icephobicity property of multifunctional surfaces has been widely studied due to their potential application in the aerospace field. Herein, a controllable CNW/PDMS biomimetic nanocomposite film with a superhydrophobic surface is fabricated. The microcolumns are etched on the surface of the biomimetic nanocomposite to provide superhydrophobicity. Two defense strategies of biomimetic nanocomposites are proposed while passive anti-icing and active electrothermal deicing behaviors of the biomimetic nanocomposite are experimentally studied. It is found that the initial nucleation time of a single water droplet is delayed by 353.3 s on the superhydrophobic surface relative to the hydrophilic surface. The adhesion strength increases with the increase of surface roughness. The heating uniformity on the biomimetic nanocomposite surface was validated by infrared thermography technology. The ice layer is completely melted within 150 s under 40 V voltage captured by a noncontact infrared camera. The proposed strategy was validated by the characterization of the passive anti-icing and active electrothermal deicing property from biomimetic nanocomposites with superhydrophobic microstructure surfaces. Research results show that the two lines of defense collaborative work for an icephobicity system were able to keep biomimetic nanocomposite surfaces ice-free under test conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01745

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Laforte, C.; Beisswenger, A. In Icephobic Materials Centrifuge Adhesion Test, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures (IWAIS XI), June 2005; pp 1–5.
  2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Y., Sui, X., Wang, Y., Liang, W., & Wang, F.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Engineering University (CN)
  • Yangzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liang, Wenyan
  • Wang, Fangxin
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2020-11-19
Volume
36
Issue
48
Pages
14483-14494
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W3102381242
Cited by
101
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 12
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Langmuir (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11532013, 11972124)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
icephobic surfaces, anti-icing, electrothermal de-icing, carbon nanowires, polydimethylsiloxane, biomimetic nanocomposites, surface roughness, droplet nucleation, ice adhesion, infrared thermography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review