The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study on Tin–Cobalt Bimetallic Phosphide Nanoparticles as a Negative Electrode of Sodium-Ion Batteries
Abstract
Tin phosphide (Sn 4 P 3 ) holds great promise because sodium-ion batteries use this material as an anode with impressive theoretical capacity. In this paper, it is reported that Co-doped Sn 4 P 3 is embedded into carbon-based materials and SnCoP/C with a porous skeleton is prepared. As a result, SnCoP/C-2, as the material utilized in sodium-ion battery anodes, exhibits reversible capacities at 415.6, 345.9, and 315.6 mAh g -1 at current intensities of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 A g -1 , respectively. The electrochemical reversibility, cycle stability, and rate performance of SnCoP/C samples are obviously better than those of Sn 4 P 3 /C. Cobalt in SnCoP/C stabilizes the conductive matrix of tin phosphide and promotes the diffusion kinetics of sodium. These results show that, with an appropriate amount of cobalt doping, highly dispersed nanoparticles can be formed in the tin phosphide matrix, which can significantly enhance the cycle stability of tin-based electrode materials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cobalt phosphides, especially those with heterointerfaces, tend to have enhanced electronic conductivity, faster reaction kinetics, and higher intrinsic activity.27−30”
From Enhanced Water Splitting Electrocatalysis with Heterointerfacial Cobalt Phosphide In Situ Supported on a Cellulose-Derived Carbon Aerogel (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries
Randau, S., Weber, D. A., Kötz, O., Koerver, R., Braun, P., Weber, A., Ivers‐Tiffée, E., Adermann, T., Kulisch, J., Zeier, W. G., et al. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 · Cited by 1,228
Chen, C., Wen, Y., Hu, X., Ji, X., Yan, M., Mai, L., Hu, P., Shan, B., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7929 · Cited by 1,151
Ge, X., Li, Z., & Yin, L. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.055 · Cited by 455
Sodium-ion battery anodes: Status and future trends
Zhang, W., Zhang, F., Ming, F., & Alshareef, H. N. (2019) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100012 · Cited by 408
Tin Phosphide as a Promising Anode Material for Na‐Ion Batteries
Kim, Y., Kim, Y., Choi, A., Woo, S.-W., Mok, D., Choi, N., Jung, Y. S., Ryu, J. H., Oh, S. M., & Lee, K. T. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201305638 · Cited by 396
Li, Z., Zhang, L., Ge, X., Li, C., Dong, S., Wang, C., & Yin, L. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.009 · Cited by 347
Yuan, H., Chen, X., Zhou, G., Zhang, W., Luo, J., Huang, H., Gan, Y., Liang, C., Xia, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2017) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00465 · Cited by 298
Fe-Doped Ni2P Nanosheet Array for High-Efficiency Electrochemical Water Oxidation
Wang, J., Ma, X., Qu, F., Asiri, A. M., & Sun, X. (2017) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02808 · Cited by 220
Zhang, W., Wu, Y., Xu, Z., Li, H., Xu, M. F., Li, J., Dai, Y., Zong, W., Chen, R., He, L. H., et al. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202201065 · Cited by 196
Li, Q., Li, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, C., Ma, J., Wang, C., Ge, X., Dong, S., & Yin, L. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600376 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ishaq, M., Jabeen, M., Haider, R., Nadir, K., Ilyas, F., He, Y., Che, H., Khan, S., Jiang, Y., Zhao, S., et al. (2025) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202424141 · Cited by 38
Maity, C. K., Roy, S., Adhikari, A. D., Kumari, K., Kim, M. J., & Sahoo, S. (2025) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d5nr01892g · Cited by 34
Park, J. B., Choi, C., Kim, M.-S., Kang, H., Kwon, E., Yu, S., & Kim, D. (2025) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01813-1 · Cited by 18
Zhang, H., Pang, M., Yang, M. C., Kong, Z., Ye, J., Sun, C., He, W., Li, W., Pak, Y. L., An, J., et al. (2025) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04214 · Cited by 11
Shen, T., Chen, X., Hu, Z., Yan, Z., Yang, L., Sun, H., Zhang, R., & Yu, H.-Y. (2025) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c03958 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, S., Feng, K., Xu, W., & Tong, J.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Shuling
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-05-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 10270-10280
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W4396574036
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Langmuir (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278255)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Keywords
- tin phosphide, Sn4P3, cobalt doping, sodium-ion battery anodes, porous skeleton, cycling stability, rate capability, electrochemical reversibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
