Cited by 58Icing and De-icing Technologiesnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFreezing and Crystallization Processes

Inhibition of Condensation Frosting by Arrays of Hygroscopic Antifreeze Drops

Sun, Xiaoda, Damle, Viraj G., Uppal, Aastha, Linder, Rubin, Chandrashekar, Sriram, Mohan, Ajay R., Rykaczewski, Konrad·2015·Langmuir

Abstract

The formation of frost and ice can have negative impacts on travel and a variety of industrial processes and is typically addressed by dispensing antifreeze substances such as salts and glycols. Despite the popularity of this anti-icing approach, some of the intricate underlying physical mechanisms are just being unraveled. For example, recent studies have shown that in addition to suppressing ice formation within its own volume, an individual salt saturated water microdroplet forms a region of inhibited condensation and condensation frosting (RIC) in its surrounding area. This occurs because salt saturated water, like most antifreeze substances, is hygroscopic and has water vapor pressure at its surface lower than water saturation pressure at the substrate. Here, we demonstrate that for macroscopic drops of propylene glycol and salt saturated water, the absolute RIC size can remain essentially unchanged for several hours. Utilizing this observation, we demonstrate that frost formation can be completely inhibited in-between microscopic and macroscopic arrays of propylene glycol and salt saturated water drops with spacing (S) smaller than twice the radius of the RIC (δ). Furthermore, by characterizing condensation frosting dynamics around various hygroscopic drop arrays, we demonstrate that they can delay complete frosting over of the samples 1.6 to 10 times longer than films of the liquids with equivalent volume. The significant delay in onset of ice nucleation achieved by dispensing propylene glycol in drops rather than in films is likely due to uniform dilution of the drops driven by thermocapillary flow. This transport mode is absent in the films, leading to faster dilution, and with that facilitated homogeneous nucleation, near the liquid-air interface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03869

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, X., Damle, V. G., Uppal, A., Linder, R., Chandrashekar, S., Mohan, A. R., & Rykaczewski, K.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rykaczewski, Konrad
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2015-12-16
Volume
31
Issue
51
Pages
13743-13752
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2430827810
Cited by
58
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Langmuir (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Freezing and Crystallization Processes
Keywords
propylene glycol, ice nucleation, homogeneous nucleation, Marangoni convection, water vapor pressure, anti-icing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review