Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interlayer Exciton Optoelectronics in a 2D Heterostructure p–n Junction

Open access
Ross, Jason S., Rivera, Pasqual, Schaibley, John, Lee-Wong, Eric, Yu, Hongyi, Taniguchi, Takashi, Watanabe, Kenji, Yan, Jiaqiang, Mandrus, David, Cobden, David, Yao, Wang, Xu, Xiaodong·2017·Nano Letters

Abstract

Semiconductor heterostructures are backbones for solid-state-based optoelectronic devices. Recent advances in assembly techniques for van der Waals heterostructures have enabled the band engineering of semiconductor heterojunctions for atomically thin optoelectronic devices. In two-dimensional heterostructures with type II band alignment, interlayer excitons, where Coulomb bound electrons and holes are confined to opposite layers, have shown promising properties for novel excitonic devices, including a large binding energy, micron-scale in-plane drift-diffusion, and a long population and valley polarization lifetime. Here, we demonstrate interlayer exciton optoelectronics based on electrostatically defined lateral p–n junctions in a MoSe 2 –WSe 2 heterobilayer. Applying a forward bias enables the first observation of electroluminescence from interlayer excitons. At zero bias, the p–n junction functions as a highly sensitive photodetector, where the wavelength-dependent photocurrent measurement allows the direct observation of resonant optical excitation of the interlayer exciton. The resulting photocurrent amplitude from the interlayer exciton is about 200 times smaller than the resonant excitation of intralayer exciton. This implies that the interlayer exciton oscillator strength is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than that of the intralayer exciton due to the spatial separation of electron and hole to the opposite layers. These results lay the foundation for exploiting the interlayer exciton in future 2D heterostructure optoelectronic devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03398

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Ross, J. S., Rivera, P., Schaibley, J., Lee-Wong, E., Yu, H., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Yan, J., Mandrus, D., Cobden, D., Yao, W., & Xu, X.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
638-643
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2567661883
Cited by
339
References
40
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interlayer Exciton Optoelectronics in a 2D Heterostructure p–n Junction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03398
The paper
Ross, J. S., Rivera, P., Schaibley, J., Lee-Wong, E., Yu, H., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Yan, J., Mandrus, D., Cobden, D., Yao, W., & Xu, X. (2017). Interlayer Exciton Optoelectronics in a 2D Heterostructure p–n Junction. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03398

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.