The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use of Gases in Flow Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This review will highlight the potential benefits that can be leveraged by using flow chemistry to allow gases to be used in research in a safer and more efficient way. An overview of the different approaches used to introduce gases into flow reactors is presented along with a synopsis of the different gaseous reactions classes already successfully translated into flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Continuous flow reactors: a perspective
Wiles, C., & Watts, P. (2012) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c1gc16022b · Cited by 626
Cited by
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
A field guide to flow chemistry for synthetic organic chemists
Capaldo, L., Wen, Z., & Noël, T. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d3sc00992k · Cited by 402
Masui, H., & Fuse, S. (2022) · Organic Process Research & Development · doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00074 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Mallia, C. J., & Baxendale, I. R.
- Venue
- Organic Process Research & Development
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-360
- ISSN
- 1083-6160 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-586X
- OpenAlex
- W2341727092
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Gases in Flow Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00222
- The paper
- Mallia, C. J., & Baxendale, I. R. (2016). The Use of Gases in Flow Synthesis. Organic Process Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
