Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biocatalysis Using Immobilized Enzymes in Continuous Flow for the Synthesis of Fine Chemicals

Thompson, Matthew P., Peñafiel, Itziar, Cosgrove, Sebastian C., Turner, Nicholas J.·2019·Organic Process Research & Development

Abstract

Biocatalysis has emerged as one of the most promising technologies to enable green synthesis of important chemicals, due to the ambient conditions generally applied for these reactions. Nonetheless, a general uptake of enzymatic transformations has been hindered by the perceived high cost of recombinant proteins. Recent interest in continuous flow from the synthetic chemistry community has now begun to spread to biotransformations, with protein immobilization playing a key part. As a consequence, continuous biotransformations using immobilized enzymes are becoming more accessible to nonexperts. This review will discuss several recent examples of continuous biotransformations that use immobilization, with a focus on examples involving fine chemical synthesis. It will also examine some of the issues that the community has as a whole, most importantly a lack of unified reporting tools to allow comparison and assessment of the different techniques.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, M. P., Peñafiel, I., Cosgrove, S. C., & Turner, N. J.
Venue
Organic Process Research & Development
Published
2018-12-10
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
9-18
ISSN
  • 1083-6160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-586X
OpenAlex
W2905478538
Cited by
273
References
1
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.