Cited by 98Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Ultralow Ru-Induced Bimetal Electrocatalysts with a Ru-Enriched and Mixed-Valence Surface Anchored on a Hollow Carbon Matrix for Oxygen Reduction and Water Splitting

Li, Guoning, Zheng, Kaitian, Li, Weisong, He, Yongchao, Xu, Chunjian·2020·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Rational design of trifunctional electrocatalysts with robust efficiency used for oxygen reduction, oxygen evolution, and hydrogen evolution reactions (ORR, OER, and HER) is of significance to renewable energy conversion techniques, which remains a challenging issue. This study integrates dominant Co/Co 3 O 4 with a small fraction of RuO 2 and the CoRu alloy anchored on a hollow carbon matrix, originating from the novel Ru-doped hollow metal-organic framework (MOF) precursor, which is synthesized via tannic etching and ion exchange. Notably, the introduced ultralow Ru (1.28 wt %) not only generates new Ru-based species but also induces a Ru-enriched surface with abundant oxygen vacancies. Moreover, a suitable balance among different valencies of Co or Ru can be tuned by oxidation time, resulting in preferable Co 2+ and Ru 4+ species. Triggered by these unparalleled surface properties along with good conductivity, hollow structure, and the synergistic effect of multiple active sites, the resulting CoRu-O/A@hollow nitrogen-doped carbon (HNC) shows robust catalytic performance for ORR/OER/HER in an alkaline electrolyte. Typically, it exhibits a potential gap of 0.662 V for OER/ORR and enables an alkaline water electrolyzer with a cell voltage of 1.558 V at 10 mA cm -2 . This work would serve as guidance for well construction of transition-metal-based trifunctional electrocatalysts by the MOF-assisted strategy or the modulation effects of low-content Ru.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.0c14521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 68 · Cited by 98

Authors
Li, G., Zheng, K., Li, W., He, Y., & Xu, C.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Chunjian
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2020-11-05
Volume
12
Issue
46
Pages
51437-51447
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W3097340616
Cited by
98
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tianjin University (110-0301030146, 110-0505000103)
  • Chemical Engineering Research Center, Tianjin University
  • Baoshun Technology Co., Ltd.
  • State Key Laboratories of Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
trifunctional electrocatalysts, oxygen reduction reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, metal-organic framework precursor, tannic acid etching, ion exchange, oxygen vacancies, mixed valence, nitrogen-doped carbon, alkaline water electrolysis, low ruthenium loading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review