Cited by 35Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Highly Ordered Pt-Based Nanoparticles Directed by the Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Wang, Zhida, Mai, Yilang, Yang, Yi, Shen, Lisha, Yan, Changfeng·2021·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Designing Pt-based nanoparticle (NP) catalysts is of great interest for the lowering of Pt usage and the enhancement of catalytic activity on the proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, it is still challenging to develop well-arrayed catalyst NPs on supports over multiple-length scales. Herein, we presented a facile strategy of producing well-ordered Pt-based NPs toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts assisted by the self-assembly of block copolymers. In contrast to the conventional Pt/C ORR catalysts with a random dispersion on carbon, the as-prepared Pt, PtCo, and PtCo@Pt NPs in our work were hexagonally arranged with a uniform quasi-spherical shape and ordered distribution. The systematic study related to their ORR activities revealed that the PtCo@Pt core-shell NP arrays were more active and more durable than PtCo, Pt, and the commercial Pt/C catalyst. In the rotating-disk electrode test, a half-wave potential ( E 1/2 ) of 0.86 V versus RHE and a 4-e ORR mechanism were found for PtCo@Pt. Single-cell performance showed that the current density and the peak power density of PtCo@Pt achieved 0.86 A/cm 2 @0.7 V and 1.05 W/cm 2 , respectively, with a Pt loading of ∼0.15 mg/cm 2 on the cathode. Also, they held 81.4 and 82.9% retention, respectively, after the durability test in the single-cell test. Density functional theory calculation results revealed that PtCo@Pt NPs had a lower d-band center and a weaker oxygen binding energy compared to Pt and PtCo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.1c04259

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 35

Authors
Wang, Z., Mai, Y., Yang, Y., Shen, L., & Yan, C.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Zhida
  • Yan, Changfeng
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
13
Issue
32
Pages
38138-38146
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W3190617088
Cited by
35
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Guangzhou Institute of Energy Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030312007, 2017A030310539, 2018A050506071)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (DNL180405)
  • Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (201904010412, 202002030349)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, block copolymer self-assembly, ordered nanoparticle arrays, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, electrocatalyst durability, d-band center, oxygen binding energy, Pt loading reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review