Highly Ordered Pt-Based Nanoparticles Directed by the Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Abstract
Designing Pt-based nanoparticle (NP) catalysts is of great interest for the lowering of Pt usage and the enhancement of catalytic activity on the proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, it is still challenging to develop well-arrayed catalyst NPs on supports over multiple-length scales. Herein, we presented a facile strategy of producing well-ordered Pt-based NPs toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts assisted by the self-assembly of block copolymers. In contrast to the conventional Pt/C ORR catalysts with a random dispersion on carbon, the as-prepared Pt, PtCo, and PtCo@Pt NPs in our work were hexagonally arranged with a uniform quasi-spherical shape and ordered distribution. The systematic study related to their ORR activities revealed that the PtCo@Pt core-shell NP arrays were more active and more durable than PtCo, Pt, and the commercial Pt/C catalyst. In the rotating-disk electrode test, a half-wave potential ( E 1/2 ) of 0.86 V versus RHE and a 4-e ORR mechanism were found for PtCo@Pt. Single-cell performance showed that the current density and the peak power density of PtCo@Pt achieved 0.86 A/cm 2 @0.7 V and 1.05 W/cm 2 , respectively, with a Pt loading of ∼0.15 mg/cm 2 on the cathode. Also, they held 81.4 and 82.9% retention, respectively, after the durability test in the single-cell test. Density functional theory calculation results revealed that PtCo@Pt NPs had a lower d-band center and a weaker oxygen binding energy compared to Pt and PtCo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Introduction of elemental S with stronger electronegativity results in a rather large positive shift in Pt 4f signals (about 0.9 eV), compared with other Pt-based electrocatalysts (about +0.2-0.3 eV in general).
“the introduction of elemental S with stronger electronega”
From Realization of Au81Pd2Pt9-S8B4.6A3.4 aerogels as superior catalysts toward HER and ORR by synergism of coarse and fine tuning d-band center of Pt (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Mai, Y., Yang, Y., Shen, L., & Yan, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Zhida
- Yan, Changfeng
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-08-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 38138-38146
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W3190617088
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Guangzhou Institute of Energy Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030312007, 2017A030310539, 2018A050506071)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (DNL180405)
- Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (201904010412, 202002030349)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Keywords
- oxygen reduction reaction, block copolymer self-assembly, ordered nanoparticle arrays, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, electrocatalyst durability, d-band center, oxygen binding energy, Pt loading reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review