Cited by 22Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsHydrogen Storage and Materials

Hierarchical SiC–Graphene Composite Aerogel-Supported Ni–Mo–S Nanosheets for Efficient pH-Universal Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Peng, Kang, Wang, Yihan, Liu, Fuzhu, Wan, Pengfei, Wang, Hongjie, Niu, Min, Su, Lei, Zhuang, Lei +1 more·2023·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

MoS 2 exhibits good prospects in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Whereas, the electrocatalytic property of MoS 2 is restrained by its insufficient active sites, low electrical conductivity, and slow water dissociation processes. Herein, an aerogel composed of silicon carbide (SiC) and graphene (SiCnw-RGO) was constructed by growing SiC nanowires (SiCnw) in the graphene aerogel (RGO) via the CVD method, and then Ni-Mo-S nanosheets were hydrothermally synthesized on the SiCnw-RGO composite aerogel to develop an efficient pH-universal electrocatalyst. Ni-Mo-S nanosheets supported on SiCnw-RGO (Ni-Mo-S@SiCnw-RGO) exhibit an interesting hierarchical three-dimensional interconnected structure of composite aerogel. The optimal Ni-Mo-S@SiCnw-RGO electrocatalyst exhibits excellent catalytic performance with low Tafel slopes of 60 mV/dec under acidic conditions and 90 mV/dec under alkaline conditions. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate a composite catalyst exhibits advantageous hydrogen adsorption free energy and water dissociation energy barrier. This study provides a reference to design an efficient hierarchical aerogel electrocatalyst.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.3c02802

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, K., Wang, Y., Liu, F., Wan, P., Wang, H., Niu, M., Su, L., Zhuang, L., & Qin, Y.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hongjie
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2023-05-31
Volume
15
Issue
23
Pages
27928-27940
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W4378802662
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M623182, 2018T111054)
  • Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2022JM-144, 2023-JC-YB-357)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51804242, 92263204)
  • Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018BSHYDZZ61)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, silicon carbide nanowires, graphene aerogel, composite aerogels, pH-universal electrocatalysts, water dissociation, hydrogen adsorption free energy, Tafel slope, acidic and alkaline conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review