The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Floatable, Self-Cleaning, and Carbon-Black-Based Superhydrophobic Gauze for the Solar Evaporation Enhancement at the Air–Water Interface
Abstract
Efficient solar evaporation plays an indispensable role in nature as well as the industry process. However, the traditional evaporation process depends on the total temperature increase of bulk water. Recently, localized heating at the air-water interface has been demonstrated as a potential strategy for the improvement of solar evaporation. Here, we show that the carbon-black-based superhydrophobic gauze was able to float on the surface of water and selectively heat the surface water under irradiation, resulting in an enhanced evaporation rate. The fabrication process of the superhydrophobic black gauze was low-cost, scalable, and easy-to-prepare. Control experiments were conducted under different light intensities, and the results proved that the floating black gauze achieved an evaporation rate 2-3 times higher than that of the traditional process. A higher temperature of the surface water was observed in the floating gauze group, revealing a main reason for the evaporation enhancement. Furthermore, the self-cleaning ability of the superhydrophobic black gauze enabled a convenient recycling and reusing process toward practical application. The present material may open a new avenue for application of the superhydrophobic substrate and meet extensive requirements in the fields related to solar evaporation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gagnon, D., Jay, O., & Kenny, G. P. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248823 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Solar-driven interfacial evaporation
Tao, P., Ni, G., Song, C., Shang, W., Wu, J., Zhu, J., Chen, G., & Deng, T. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0260-7 · Cited by 2,380
Materials for solar-powered water evaporation
Zhao, F., Guo, Y., Zhou, X., Shi, W., & Yu, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-0182-4 · Cited by 1,541
A salt-rejecting floating solar still for low-cost desalination
Ni, G., Zandavi, S. H., Javid, S. M., Boriskina, S. V., Cooper, T. A., & Chen, G. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee00220g · Cited by 939
Synthetic Graphene Oxide Leaf for Solar Desalination with Zero Liquid Discharge
Finnerty, C., Zhang, L., Sedlak, D. L., Nelson, K. L., & Mi, B. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b03040 · Cited by 359
Wang, P. (2018) · Environmental Science: Nano · doi:10.1039/c8en00156a · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Chen, J., Guo, D., Cao, M., & Jiang, L.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-06-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13645-13652
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2005647405
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.