Tailoring Particle Size of Mesoporous Silica Nanosystem To Antagonize Glioblastoma and Overcome Blood–Brain Barrier
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the main bottleneck to prevent some macromolecular substance entering the cerebral circulation, resulting the failure of chemotherapy in the treatment of glioma. Cancer nanotechnology displays potent applications in glioma therapy owing to their penetration across BBB and accumulation into the tumor core. In this study, we have tailored the particle size of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) through controlling the hydrolysis rate and polycondensation degree of reactants, and optimized the nanosystem that could effectively penetrate BBB and target the tumor tissue to achieve enhanced antiglioma efficacy. The nanoparticle was conjugated with cRGD peptide to enhance its cancer targeting effect, and then used to load antineoplastic doxorubicin. Therefore, the functionalized nanosystem (DOX@MSNs) selectively recognizes and binds to the U87 cells with higher expression level of ανβ3 integrin, sequentially enhancing the cellular uptake and inhibition to glioma cells, especially the particle size at 40 nm. This particle could rapidly enter cancer cells and was difficult to excrete outside the cells, thus leading to high drug accumulation. Furthermore, DOX@MSNs exhibited much higher selectivity and anticancer activity than free DOX and induced the glioma cells apoptosis through triggering ROS overproduction. Interestingly, DOX@MSNs at about 40 nm exhibited stronger permeability across the BBB, and could disrupt the VM-capability of glioma cells by regulating the expression of E-cadherin, FAK, and MMP-2, thus achieving satisfactory antiglioblastoma efficacy and avoiding the unwanted toxic side effects to normal brain tissue. Taken together, these results suggest that tailoring the particle size of MSNs nanosystem could be an effective strategy to antagonize glioblastoma and overcome BBB.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mesoporous silica nanoparticle penetration across the BBB is size-dependent.
“indicating a size-dependent penetration mechanism.”
From The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery (2023) · cites this paper as [340]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles at sizes 20, 40, and 80 nm had transport capabilities of 44.0%, 59.2%, and 38.6%, respectively, all higher than free drugs at 32.8%.
“The transport capability of MSNs at the sizes of 20, 40, and 80 nm were evaluated by the authors and were calculated to be 44.0%, 59.2%, and 38.6%, respectively, which were all higher than that of free drugs (32.8%)”
From The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery (2023) · cites this paper as [340]
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558 · see citing works
Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
Obermeier, B., Daneman, R., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3407 · Cited by 2,452 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery
Wu, D., Chen, Q., Chen, X., Han, F., Chen, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
“340 They found that such system exhibited strong permeability across the BBB and then could induce cancer cells apoptosis by releasing drugs.”
BackgroundFunctionalized Nanomaterials Capable of Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier
Zha, S., Liu, H., Li, H., Li, H., Wong, K.-L., & All, A. H. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c10674 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Biscaglia, F., Ripani, G., Rajendran, S., Benna, C., Mocellin, S., Bocchinfuso, G., Meneghetti, M., Palleschi, A., & Gobbo, M. (2019) · ACS Applied Nano Materials · doi:10.1021/acsanm.9b01392 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mo, J., He, L., Ma, B., & Chen, T.
- Affiliations
- Jinan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Tianfeng
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-03-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6811-6825
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2299983588
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21271002)
- Foundation for High-level Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong
- Guangdong Province
- Guangdong Frontier and Key Technological Innovation Special Funds (2014B050505012)
- Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province (S2013050014667)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- mesoporous silica nanoparticles, glioblastoma, blood-brain barrier penetration, particle size control, doxorubicin, cRGD peptide, tumor targeting, reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, extracellular matrix degradation, E-cadherin, focal adhesion kinase, MMP-2, nanoparticle drug delivery
- MeSH terms
- Blood-Brain Barrier, Doxorubicin, Drug Carriers, Glioblastoma, Humans, Silicon Dioxide, Porosity, Apoptosis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Cell Line, Tumor, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review