Cited by 192Advancements in Battery MaterialsSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

Seaweed-Derived Route to Fe2O3 Hollow Nanoparticles/N-Doped Graphene Aerogels with High Lithium Ion Storage Performance

Liu, Long, Yang, Xianfeng, Lv, Chunxiao, Zhu, Aimei, Zhu, Xiaoyi, Guo, Shaojun, Chen, Chengmeng, Yang, Dongjiang·2016·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

We developed a nanoscale Kirkendall effect assisted method for simple and scalable synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) Fe2O3 hollow nanoparticles (NPs)/graphene aerogel through the use of waste seaweed biomass as new precursors. The Fe2O3 hollow nanoparticles with an average shell thickness of ∼6 nm are distributed on 3D graphene aerogel, and also act as spacers to make the separation of the neighboring graphene nanosheets. The graphene-Fe2O3 aerogels exhibit high rate capability (550 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1)) and excellent cyclic stability (729 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1) for 300 cycles), outperforming all of the reported Fe2O3/graphene hybrid electrodes, due to the hollow structure of the active Fe2O3 NPs and the unique structure of the 3D graphene aerogel framework. The present work represents an important step toward high-level control of high-performance 3D graphene-Fe-based NPs aerogels for maximizing lithium storage with new horizons for important fundamental and technological applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.5b12427

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Yang, X., Lv, C., Zhu, A., Zhu, X., Guo, S., Chen, C., & Yang, D.
Affiliations
  • Qingdao University (CN)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Key Laboratory of Carbon Materials, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
Corresponding author
  • Guo, Shaojun
  • Yang, Dongjiang
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2016-03-14
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
7047-7053
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2291798095
Cited by
192
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 14
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (130104759)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21501105, 51473081, 51503109)
  • Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
lithium-ion battery anodes, Kirkendall effect, biomass precursors, rate capability, cycling stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review