Cited by 12Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionHydrogen Storage and MaterialsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Neuron-Inspired Interpenetrative Network Composed of Cobalt–Phosphorus-Derived Nanoparticles Embedded within Porous Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Hydrogen Production

Open access
Shen, Juanxia, Yang, Zhi, Ge, Mengzhan, Li, Ping, Nie, Huagui, Cai, Qiran, Gu, Cancan, Yang, Keqin +1 more·2016·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

The ongoing search for cheap and efficient hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) electrocatalysts to replace currently used catalysts based on Pt or its alloys has been considered as an prevalent strategy to produce renewable and clean hydrogen energy. Herein, inspired by the neuron structure in biological systems, we demonstrate a novel fabrication strategy via a simple two-step method for the synthesis of a neuronlike interpenetrative nanocomposite network of Co-P embedded in porous carbon nanotubes (NIN-Co-P/PCNTs). It is found that the interpenetrative network provides a natural transport path to accelerate the hydrogen production process. The embedded-type structure improves the utilization ratio of Co-P and the hollow, tubelike, and porous structure of PCNTs further promote charge and reactant transport. These factors allow the as-prepared NIN-Co-P/PCNTs to achieve a onset potential low to 43 mV, a Tafel slope as small as 40 mV/decade, an excellent stability, and a high turnover frequency value of 3.2 s(-1) at η = 0.2 V in acidic conditions. These encouraging properties derived from the neuronlike interpenetrative network structure might offer new inspiration for the preparation of more nanocomposites for applications in other catalytic and optoelectronic field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.6b04718

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shen, J., Yang, Z., Ge, M., Li, P., Nie, H., Cai, Q., Gu, C., Yang, K., & Huang, S.
Affiliations
  • Wenzhou University (CN)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Zhi
  • Huang, Shaoming
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2016-06-30
Volume
8
Issue
27
Pages
17284-17291
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2432524838
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21273163, 21475096, 51420105002, 51572197)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, porous carbon nanotubes, electrocatalysts, acidic electrocatalysis, charge transport, platinum-free catalysts, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review