Recyclable Poly(urethane-urea) Covalent Adaptable Network Foams via Catalyst-, Isocyanate-, and Additive-Free Synthesis
Abstract
For decades, poly(urethane-urea) (PUU) foam production has relied on hazardous isocyanates and a complex array of external catalysts and blowing agents, resulting in chemically persistent materials that defy recycling. Herein, we break this convention by reporting the first-ever synthesis of high-performance PUU foams through an entirely autonomous, isocyanate-free, and additive-free pathway. By leveraging the ring-opening of thiazolidin-2-one with multifunctional amines, we establish a streamlined reaction that simultaneously constructs a covalent adaptable network (CAN) and triggers in situ CO2 evolution. This chemistry bypasses traditional reagents; instead, internal thiol groups react with ethylene carbonate to drive foaming under entirely catalyst-free conditions. By precisely tuning the tris(2-aminoethyl)amine ratio, we synchronize gas expansion with matrix vitrification, overcoming the structural collapse typical of nontraditional systems. The resulting foams feature hindered urea linkages that impart dissociative CAN behavior, enabling full chemical reprocessability and structural recovery over multiple cycles without compromising mechanical integrity. With an open-cell architecture and acoustic performance comparable to those of the tested commercial reference materials under the present measurement conditions, this work provides a promising strategy for designing circular cellular materials that contribute to a zero-waste chemical economy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Biomechanics of cellular solids
Gibson, L. J. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
Mechanically Activated, Catalyst-Free Polyhydroxyurethane Vitrimers
Fortman, D. J., Brutman, J. P., Cramer, C. J., Hillmyer, M. A., & Dichtel, W. R. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b08084 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Lyu, J., Jeong, C., Jo, J. Y., Heo, N. J., Park, Y. I., Jung, H., Bae, H. E., Le, H. D., Jin, Y.-J., Jeong, J.-E., & Kim, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jin, Young-Jae
- Jeong, Ji-Eun
- Kim, Jin Chul
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2026-10-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 56092-56104
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W7215068503
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (00430401, 00434688)
- Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KS2641-10)
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (DS2684-01)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Keywords
- covalent adaptable networks, isocyanate-free synthesis, catalyst-free synthesis, ethylene carbonate, thiol-ene click chemistry, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine, urea linkage, acoustic performance, open-cell foams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review