The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flexible, Ultrathin, and High-Efficiency Electromagnetic Shielding Properties of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/Carbon Composite Films
Abstract
In this study, we fabricated conductive poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/carbon composites simply by dispersing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and graphene nanoplatelets into a PVDF solution. The electrical conductivity and the electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding of the PVDF/carbon composites were increased by increasing the conductive carbon filler amounts. Moreover, we also found that the EMI shielding properties of the PVDF/CNT/graphene composites were higher than those of PVDF/CNT and PVDF/graphene composites. The mean EMI shielding values of PVDF/5 wt %-CNT, PVDF/10 wt %-graphene, and PVDF/CNT/graphene composite films with a thickness of 0.1 mm were 22.41, 18.70, and 27.58 dB, respectively. An analysis of the shielding mechanism showed that the main contribution to the EMI shielding came from the absorption mechanism, and that the EMI shielding could be tuned by controlling the films’ thickness. The total shielding of the PVDF/CNT/graphene films increased from 21.90 to 36.46 dB as the thickness was increased from 0.06 mm to 0.25 mm. In particular, the PVDF/carbon composite films, with a thickness of 0.1 mm, achieved the highest specific shielding values of 1 310 dB cm 2 /g for the PVDF/5 wt %-CNT composite and 1 557 dB cm 2 /g for the PVDF/CNT/graphene composite, respectively. This was due to the ultrathin thickness. Our study provides the groundwork for an effective way to design flexible, ultrathin conductive polymer composite film for application in miniaturized electronic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Recent Progress in Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites
Sun, X., Huang, C., Wang, L., Liang, L., Cheng, Y., Fei, W., & Li, Y. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202001105 · Cited by 490
Highly Efficient and Reliable Transparent Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Film
Jia, L.-C., Yan, D.-X., Liu, X., Ma, R., Wu, H.-Y., & Li, Z.-M. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b00492 · Cited by 293
Chakraborty, T., Dutta, S., Mahapatra, A. S., Das, K., Das, S., Roy, A., Mukherjee, M., Das, S., & Sutradhar, S. (2023) · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170508 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, B., Zhao, C., Li, R., Hamidinejad, S. M., & Park, C. B.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 20873-20884
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2619724153
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.