The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lubricant-Infused Surfaces for Low-Surface-Tension Fluids: Promise versus Reality
Abstract
The past few decades have seen substantial effort for the design and manufacturing of hydrophobic structured surfaces for enhanced steam condensation in water-based applications. Such surfaces promote dropwise condensation and easy droplet removal. However, less priority has been given to applications utilizing low-surface-tension fluids as the condensate. Lubricant-infused surfaces (LISs) or slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs) have recently been developed, where the atomically smooth, defect-free slippery surface leads to reduced pinning of water droplets and omniphobic characteristics. The remarkable results of LISs and SLIPSs with a range of working fluid droplets give hope of their viability with low-surface-tension condensates. However, the presence of the additional liquid in the form of lubricant brings other issues to consider. Here, in an effort to study the dropwise condensation potential of LISs and SLIPSs, we investigate the miscibility of a range of low-surface-tension fluids with widely used lubricants in LIS and SLIPS design. We consider a wide range of condensate surface tensions (12-73 mN/m) and different categories of lubricants with varied viscosities (5-2700 cSt), namely, fluorinated Krytox oils, hydrocarbon silicone oils, mineral oil, and ionic liquids. In addition, we use both theory and pendant drop experiments to predict the cloaking behavior of the lubricants and immiscible condensate working fluid pairs. Our work not only shows that careful attention must be paid to lubricant-condensate selection to create long-lasting LISs or SLIPSs but also develops lubricant selection design guidelines for stable LISs and SLIPSs for enhanced condensation in applications utilizing low-surface-tension working fluids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liquid-Infused Nanostructured Surfaces with Extreme Anti-Ice and Anti-Frost Performance
Kim, P., Wong, T.-S., Alvarenga, J., Kreder, M. J., Adorno-Martinez, W. E., & Aizenberg, J. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn302310q · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Liquid-Infused Surfaces: A Review of Theory, Design, and Applications
Villegas, M., Zhang, Y., Abu Jarad, N., Soleymani, L., & Didar, T. F. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04129 · Cited by 459
Peppou-Chapman, S., Hong, J. K., Waterhouse, A., & Neto, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00036a · Cited by 373
Fundamentals of icing and common strategies for designing biomimetic anti-icing surfaces
Li, Q., & Guo, Z. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta03259a · Cited by 292
Recent progress in the anti-icing performance of slippery liquid-infused surfaces
Heydarian, S., Jafari, R., & Momen, G. (2021) · Progress in Organic Coatings · doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106096 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Sett, S., Yan, X., Barac, G., Bolton, L. W., & Miljkovic, N.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-10-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 36400-36408
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2756894938
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.