Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conductive Copper Benzenehexathiol Coordination Polymer as a Hydrogen Evolution Catalyst

Huang, Xing, Yao, Huiying, Cui, Yutao, Hao, Wei, Zhu, Jia, Xu, Wei, Zhu, Daoben·2017·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

A graphene-like coordination polymer based on copper(II) benzenehexathiol (Cu-BHT, 1 ) with high electric conductivity (10 3 S·cm –1 ) was prepared recently. The high conductivity makes this material a good candidate for electrocatalysis, and here its catalytic activity toward hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was evaluated. Cu-BHT shows good activity and stability for HER in acidic solutions under high current densities. By changing the preparation conditions, the morphology of Cu-BHT materials was controlled at the mesoscale, which allows the preparation of a thin film (TF- 1 ), nanocrystal (NC- 1 ), and amorphous nanoparticle (NP- 1 ) of Cu-BHT. The overpotential of Cu-BHT toward HER shows an improved activity from 760 mV (NC- 1 ) to 450 mV (NP- 1 ) at a current density of 10 mA·cm –2 . A Tafel slope of ∼95 mV·dec –1 and an exchange current density of 10 –3 mA·cm –2 were achieved under optimized conditions. Density functional theory calculations suggest that the “Cu-edge site” on the (100) surface plays an important role in improving the HER catalytic performance of Cu-BHT nanoparticles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.7b14523

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Huang, X., Yao, H., Cui, Y., Hao, W., Zhu, J., Xu, W., & Zhu, D.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
9
Issue
46
Pages
40752-40759
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2766727083
Cited by
182
References
4
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.