The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of Plasmonic Ag and Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Codecorated Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheet Composites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity: Full-Spectrum Response Ability and Mechanism Insight
Abstract
The full utilization of solar energy has attracted great attention in the photocatalysis and environmental pollutant control. In this study, the local surface plasmon resonance effect of Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs) with the upconversion property of nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) was first combined for the formation of ternary Ag/N-GQDs/g-C 3 N 4 nanocomposites. The prepared material presents enhanced full-spectrum light response ability, even in near-infrared (NIR) light. The experiment results disclosed that the 0.5% N-GQDs and 2.0% Ag NPs co-doped g-C 3 N 4 show the highest photocatalytic activity, achieving 92.8 and 31.3% removal efficiency under full-spectrum light and NIR light irradiation, respectively, which was three-fold than that of pristine g-C 3 N 4 . The boosted photocatalytic activity can be attributed to the synergistic effect among the g-C 3 N 4, N-GQDs, and Ag NPs. The g-C 3 N 4 nanosheets can serve as the reaction matrix and support for the dispersion of N-GQDs and Ag NPs, inhibiting their agglomeration. The existence of Ag NPs and N-GQDs can promote the light absorption and transfer ability, leading to the generation of more photoinduced charges. Simultaneously, N-GQDs and Ag NPs can efficiently transfer and reserve electrons, which can accelerate the photoinduced electrons’ migration, inhibiting the recombination. The comprehensive effect of the reasons mentioned above resulted in the unique photocatalytic activity of the prepared Ag/N-GQDs/g-C 3 N 4 nanocomposites. This study provides a new strategy for the formation of highly efficient photocatalysts with broad-spectrum light response ability and the potential for realistic wastewater pollution control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts
Qu, Y., & Duan, X. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35355e · Cited by 1,466
Cited by
Yang, M., Gao, M., Hong, M., & Ho, G. W. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802894 · Cited by 389
Tang, R., Gong, D., Zhou, Y., Deng, Y., Feng, C., Xiong, S., Huang, Y., Peng, G., & Li, L. (2022) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120929 · Cited by 341
Self-citationTang, R., Gong, D., Deng, Y., Xiong, S., Zheng, J., Li, L., Zhou, Z., Su, L., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126944 · Cited by 280
Self-citationTi3C2 2D MXene: Recent Progress and Perspectives in Photocatalysis
Tang, R., Xiong, S., Gong, D., Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Su, L., Ding, C., Yang, L., & Liao, C. (2020) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.0c12905 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, Y., Tang, L., Feng, C., Zeng, G., Wang, J., Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Chen, S., & Zhou, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-12-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 42816-42828
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2770639799
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.