Heparin-Eluting Electrospun Nanofiber Yarns for Antithrombotic Vascular Sutures
Abstract
The surgical connection of blood vessels, anastomosis, is a critical procedure in many reparative, transplantation, and reconstructive surgical procedures. However, effective restoration of circulation is complicated by pathological clotting (thrombosis) or progressive occlusion due to excess cell proliferation that often leads to additional surgeries and increases morbidity and mortality risk for patients. Pharmaceutical agents have been tested to prevent these complications, but many have unacceptable systemic side effects. Therefore, an alternative approach to deliver these drugs at the site of injury in a controlled manner is necessary. The objective of this study was to develop electrospun nanofibers composed of polyester poly(lactide- co -glycolide) (PLGA), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and positively charged copolymer, poly(lactide- co -glycolide)- graft -polyethylenimine (PgP) for electrostatic binding and release of heparin for application as an antithrombotic microvascular suture. PgP was synthesized with different coupling ratios between PLGA and branched polyethylenimine (bPEI) to obtain PgP 1 (∼1 PLGA grafted to 1 bPEI) and PgP 3.7 (∼3.7 PLGA grafted to 1 bPEI). Nanofiber yarns (PLGA/PEO/PgP 1 and PLGA/PEO/PgP 3.7 ) were fabricated by electrospinning. Heparin immobilization on the positively charged nanofiber yarns was visualized using fluorescein-conjugated heparin (F-Hep), and the amount of immobilized F-Hep was higher on both PLGA/PEO/PgP 3.7 and PLGA/PEO/PgP 1 than yarns without PgP (PLGA/PEO). We also found that F-Hep was released from both PgP-containing yarns in a sustained manner over 20 days, while over 60% of F-Hep was released within 4 h from PLGA/PEO. Finally, we observed that heparin-eluting nanofiber yarns with both PgP 1 and PgP 3.7 showed significantly longer clotting times than nanofiber yarns without PgP. The clotting time of PLGA/PEO/PgP 3.7 was not significantly different than that of free heparin (0.5 μg/mL). These results show that heparin-eluting electrospun nanofiber yarns may offer a basis for the development of microvascular sutures with anticoagulant activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surface-immobilized heparin ameliorates hemocompatibility of coated surfaces by interacting with VEGFRs on ECs and preventing platelet adhesion.
“Surface-immobilized heparin has been applied during preparation of different biomaterials to ameliorate the hemocompatibility of coated surfaces by interacting with vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) on ECs and preventing platelet adhesion [225,226].”
From Liver tissue engineering using decellularized scaffolds: Current progress, challenges, and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [225]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, S., Dong, T., Li, Y., Sun, M., Qi, Y., Liu, J., Kuss, M. A., Chen, S., & Duan, B. (2022) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101473 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Hussein, K. H., Park, K.-M., Yu, L., Song, S.-H., Woo, H.-M., & Kwak, H.-H. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.029 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Hussein, K. H., Ahmadzada, B., Correa, J. C., Sultan, A., Wilken, S., Amiot, B., & Nyberg, S. L. (2024) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Surface-immobilized heparin has been applied during preparation of different biomaterials to ameliorate the hemocompatibility of coated surfaces by interacting with vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) on ECs and preventing platelet adhesion [225,226].”
- Authors
- Bae, S., DiBalsi, M. J., Meilinger, N., Zhang, C., Beal, E., Korneva, G., Brown, R. O., Kornev, K. G., & Lee, J. S.
- Affiliations
- United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Prisma Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Jeoung Soo
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 8426-8435
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2788268138
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5P20GM103444-07)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Keywords
- vascular anastomosis, PLGA, poly(ethylene oxide), heparin immobilization, sustained drug release, thromboprophylaxis, controlled drug delivery, electrostatic binding
- MeSH terms
- Fibrinolytic Agents, Heparin, Polymers, Sutures, Nanofibers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review