Cited by 55Surface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityIcing and De-icing Technologiesnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

Meltwater Evolution during Defrosting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Chu, Fuqiang, Wu, Xiaomin, Wang, Lingli·2018·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Defrosting is essential for removing frost from engineering surfaces, but some fundamental issues are still unclear, especially for defrosting on superhydrophobic surfaces. Here, defrosting experiments on prepared superhydrophobic surfaces were conducted along with the investigation on meltwater evolution characteristics. According to the experiments, the typical meltwater evolution process on superhydrophobic surfaces can be divided into two stages: dewetting by edge curling and dewetting by shrinkage. The edge curling of a meltwater film is a distinct phenomenon and has been first reported in this work. Profiting from the ultralow adhesion of the superhydrophobic surface, edge curling is mainly attributed to two unbalanced forces (one at the interface between the ice slurry layer and pure water layer and the other in the triple phase line area) acting on the layered meltwater film. During the multi-meltwater evolution process, the nonbreaking of chained droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces is also an interesting phenomenon, which is controlled by the interaction between the surface tension and the retentive force because of contact angle hysteresis. An approximate criterion was then developed to explain and determine the status of chained droplets, and experimental data from various surfaces have validated the effectiveness of this criterion. This work may deepen the understanding of defrosting on superhydrophobic surfaces and promote antifrosting/icing applications in eng…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.7b16087

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall frost layer on a superhydrophobic surface can be effortlessly separated directly from the surface under vertical conditions compared with hydrophilic surfaces, involving minimal rupture and minimal melting, thus resulting in a significantly reduced defrosting time.

    “Chu [67] conducted a comparison and discovered that the overall frost layer on a superhydrophobic sur­ face can be effortlessly separated directly from the surface under vertical conditions compared with hydrophilic surfaces. This process involved minimal rupture during defrosting and minimal melting, thus resulting in a significantly reduced defrosting time.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, F., Wu, X., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Xiaomin
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2017-12-19
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1415-1421
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2771138357
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51476084, 51621062)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
thawing, superhydrophobic surfaces, dewetting, shrinkage, contact angle hysteresis, surface tension, icing prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review