The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lotus Seedpod-Derived Hard Carbon with Hierarchical Porous Structure as Stable Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries
Abstract
Hard carbon material is one of the candidates with great promise as anode-active material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). Here, new types of biomass-derived hard carbons were obtained via one-step carbonization of lotus seedpods at 1000–1400 °C, respectively. The control of carbonization temperature proved to be significant in controlling the lattice characterization of lotus seedpod-derived hard carbon. Higher temperature generally promoted the lattice graphitization and thus generated a more narrowed d -interlayer space with limited pore volume. The hard carbon pyrolyzed at 1200 °C achieved an optimized reversible capacity of 328.8 mAh g –1 and exhibited a remarkable capacity retention of 90% after 200 cycles. In addition, such a biomass-derived hard carbon presented improved cyclic stability and rate performance, revealing capacity of 330.6, 288.9, 216.9, 116.5, and 78.3 mAh g –1 at 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 mA g –1, respectively. Intrinsically, high pyrolysis temperature (1400 °C) gave rise to more narrowed carbon lattice and reduced pore volume and, thus, failed to accommodate sodium ions either from the intercalation into lattice or the ion adsorption onto the pore surface. Such combined advantages of lotus seedpod-derived hard carbon, including the abundance, sufficiently adequate reversible capacity, and prominent cycling and rate property allowed for its large-scale application as promising anode material for SIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of hard carbon from argan shells for Na-ion batteries
Dahbi, M., Kiso, M., Kubota, K., Horiba, T., Chafik, T., Hida, K., Matsuyama, T., & Komaba, S. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta01394a · Cited by 347
Cited by
Tang, Z., Zhang, R., Wang, H., Zhou, S., Pan, Z., Huang, Y., Sun, D., Tang, Y., Ji, X., Amine, K., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39637-5 · Cited by 846
Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Farghali, M., El-Azazy, M., Elgarahy, A. M., Fahim, R. A., Maksoud, M. I. A. A., Ajlan, A. A., Yousry, M., Saleem, Y., et al. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x · Cited by 515
Zhang, M., Li, Y., Wu, F., Bai, Y., & Wu, C. (2021) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105738 · Cited by 412
Self-citationSenthil, C., & Lee, C. W. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110464 · Cited by 377
Huang, J., Wu, K., Xu, G., Wu, M., Dou, S., & Wu, C. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs01029a · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, F., Zhang, M., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Dong, R., & Wu, C.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-03-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 12554-12561
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2922072439
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.