The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-Matrix Membranes Formed from Imide-Functionalized UiO-66-NH2 for Improved Interfacial Compatibility
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) formed by dispersing metal–organic framework (MOF) particles in polymers have attracted significant attention because these composite systems can potentially surpass the separation performance of pure polymers alone. However, performance improvements are often unrealized because of poor interfacial compatibility between the MOF and the polymer, which results in interfacial defects. From a practical perspective, strategies are needed to address these defects so that MMMs can be deployed in real-world separation processes. From a fundamental perspective, strategies are needed to reliably form defect-free MMMs so that transport models can be applied to estimate pure MOF property sets, thereby enabling the development of robust structure–property relationships. To address these interfacial challenges, we have developed a method to surface-functionalize a UiO-66-NH2 MOF with a nanoscopic shell of covalently tethered 4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene)diphthalic anhydride–Durene oligomers. When combined with a high-molecular-weight polymer of identical chemical structure to that of the imide-functional MOF surface, defect-free MMMs with uniform particle dispersions can be formed. With this technique, both permeabilities and selectivities of select gases in the MMMs were improved at loadings ranging from 5 to 40 wt %. At a 40 wt % loading, CO2 permeability and CO2/CH4 selectivity were enhanced by 48 and 15%, respectively. Additionally, pure MOF permeabilities for H2, N2, O2, CH4, and CO2 were predicted by the Maxwell model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Odian, G. (2004) · doi:10.1002/047147875x · Cited by 7,158
Cited by
Advances in metal–organic framework-based membranes
Cheng, Y., Datta, S. J., Zhou, S., Jia, J., Shekhah, O., & Eddaoudi, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00031h · Cited by 423
Zhang, Y., Xu, X., Yue, C., Song, L., Lv, Y., Liu, F., & Li, A. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126546 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Qian, Q., Wu, A. X., Chi, W. S., Asinger, P. A., Lin, S., Hypsher, A., & Smith, Z. P.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-31
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 31257-31269
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2966423818
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.