Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electronically Coupled SnO2 Quantum Dots and Graphene for Efficient Nitrogen Reduction Reaction

Chu, Ke, Liu, Ya-ping, Li, Yu-biao, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Hu·2019·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Electrocatalytic N 2 reduction reaction (NRR) provides an effective and renewable approach for artificial NH 3 production, but still remains a grand challenge because of the low NH 3 yield and Faradaic efficiency (FE). Herein, we reported that the SnO 2 quantum dots (QDs) supported on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) could efficiently and stably catalyze NRR at ambient conditions. The NRR performance of resulting SnO 2 /RGO was studied by both experimental techniques and density functional theory calculations. It was found that the ultrasmall SnO 2 QDs (2 nm) grown on RGO could provide abundant sites for efficient N 2 adsorption. Significantly, the strongly electronically coupled SnO 2 QDs and RGO brought about the enhanced conductivity and the decreased work function, which led to a considerably lowered energy barrier of *N 2 → *N 2 H that was the rate-determining step of the NRR process. Meanwhile, the SnO 2 /RGO exhibited inferior hydrogen evolution reaction activity. As a result, the SnO 2 /RGO delivered a high NH 3 yield of 25.6 μg h –1 mg –1 (5.1 μg cm –2 h –1 ) and an FE of 7.1% in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 at −0.5 V (vs RHE), together with the outstanding selectivity and stability, endowing it as a promising electrocatalyst for N 2 fixation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.9b08055

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chu, K., Liu, Y.-P., Li, Y.-B., Wang, J., & Zhang, H.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2019-08-19
Volume
11
Issue
35
Pages
31806-31815
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2969995230
Cited by
190
References
3
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.