Cited by 11biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

A Method for Evaluating the Film-Blowing Processability of Biodegradable Materials

Tian, Jing, Cheng, Xiaoliang, Guo, Baohua, Xu, Jun·2023·ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Abstract

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx), an emergent biodegradable polymer, exhibits excellent biodegradability in nature, particularly in seawater. However, the challenge in film-blowing of PHBHHx limits its wide-scale application. More generally, the suitability of biodegradable polymers (such as PHBHHx) for blown film processing has been rarely reported, and the commonly used extensional viscosity test methods are not applicable due to the low melt viscosity of most biodegradable polymers. To overcome these challenges, in this work, a laboratory test method for evaluating the film-blowing processability of biodegradable materials using a small amount of raw materials was established. The key indicators for film-blowing processability were proposed, including the entrance pressure drop in capillary rheology and the tensile stress and strain at break of melt in the DMA test. The generalizability of the key indicators was verified using various commercially available blown film materials, including biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers. Based on the key indicators, the optimal formulation of PHBHHx for film-blowing was designed and successfully validated in pilot equipment. Finally, a quantitative relation between material formulation, key indicators, and film-blowing processability was developed to guide the blown film processing and formulation design. Not limited to biodegradable polymers, the method can also be applied to evaluate film-blowing processability of other polymer materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsapm.3c01978

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 11

Authors
Tian, J., Cheng, X., Guo, B., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Jun
Venue
ACS Applied Polymer Materials
Published
2023-10-02
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
8774-8785
ISSN
2637-6105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387263102
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Applied Polymer Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Keywords
biodegradable polymers, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate), capillary rheology, entrance pressure drop

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review