Enhanced Biodegradation of Silk Fibroin Hydrogel for Preventing Postoperative Adhesion
Abstract
An absorbable adhesion barrier is a medical device that prevents postoperative adhesion and matches its biodegradation time with the regeneration period of its target tissues, which is important for antiadhesion effects. Physical hydrogels of Bombyx mori silk fibroin (SF) proteins are degradable in vivo . However, their biodegradation time is too long to exert antiadhesion effects. To shorten the biodegradation time of the SF hydrogels, we decreased the molecular weight (MW) of the SF proteins by alkaline treatment and prepared low-MW (LMW) SF hydrogels. The hydrogels contained less β-sheet crystalline and more amorphous structures than conventional, high-MW (HMW) SF hydrogels. Because of the potential loosened SF molecular structures in the hydrogel networks, the LMW SF hydrogels showed enhanced biodegradation (i.e., shorter in vitro enzymatic biodegradation time and faster in vivo biodegradation rate) as well as a lower affinity for plasma proteins and fibroblasts, which are involved in postoperative adhesion formation. An antiadhesion test using a rat abdominal adhesion model demonstrated that the LMW SF hydrogel applied to the abraded cecum was almost completely degraded within two weeks postimplantation, with a significantly lower adhesion severity score than that in the untreated model rat group. Conversely, the HMW SF hydrogel remained between the cecum and abdominal wall, with the same adhesion severity as that of the untreated model rat group. Therefore, we concluded…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LMW silk's faster bioresorption was key: it elicited less fibrous encapsulation, lower plasma protein/fibroblast attachment, and was gone by the time healing occurred.
“The LMW silk’s faster bioresorption was key: it elicited less fibrous encapsulation, lower plasma protein/fibroblast attachment, and was gone by the time healing occurred (Figure 4(B1–B11)) [89].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
In a rat cecal abrasion model, a high-molecular-weight silk film remained in the abdomen and did not reduce adhesions (adhesion severity equal to untreated controls).
“High-molecular-weight (HMW) silk hydrogels degrade slowly in vivo, and in a rat cecal abrasion model, a HMW silk film remained in the abdomen and did not reduce adhesions (adhesion severity equal to untreated controls).”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
An alkaline-treated low-molecular-weight silk fibroin hydrogel, with reduced β-sheet crystallinity, fully biodegraded within ~2 weeks and significantly lowered adhesion severity scores vs. untreated rats.
“By contrast, an alkaline-treated low-molecular-weight (LMW) silk fibroin hydrogel, with reduced β-sheet crystallinity, fully biodegraded within ~2 weeks and significantly lowered adhesion severity scores vs. untreated rats.”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
Cites
Zhang, W., Wang, X., Wang, S., Zhao, J., Xu, L., Zhu, C., Zeng, D., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Kaplan, D. L., et al. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.047 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kambe, Y., Kawano, Y., Sasaki, M., Koga, M., Fujita, N., & Kameda, T.
- Affiliations
- National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP)
- Fujita Health University (JP)
- Charlie Lab Inc., 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
- Corresponding author
- Kambe, Yusuke
- Venue
- ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-11-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7441-7450
- ISSN
- 2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404079494
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP23ym0126807)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22K19905)
- Atsumaru Holdings, Inc.
- Charlie Lab, Inc.
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- silk fibroin hydrogel, Bombyx mori, postoperative adhesion prevention, biodegradation, molecular weight reduction, alkali treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, plasma protein adsorption, fibroblast adhesion, rat model
- MeSH terms
- Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Cecum, Fibroins, Male, Molecular Weight, Bombyx, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Hydrogels, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review