The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photocatalytic CO2Reduction: A Review of Ab Initio Mechanism, Kinetics, and Multiscale Modeling Simulations
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Climate change has prompted scientists to search for possible ways of reducing CO2 emissions or even capturing it from the atmosphere. Catalytic reduction of CO2 into value-added chemicals has been put forward as a viable strategy. While thermocatalytic routes of producing CO, methanol, methane, and higher hydrocarbons from CO2 have been the focus of considerable research efforts, photocatalytic conversion is an emerging approach. Photoactivation of CO2 has potential as a greener process because it could be carried out at lower temperatures and pressures, decreasing the energy consumption. The recent advent of available computational power and tools has made it possible to study the reaction in silico for catalyst prediction and mechanism elucidation. In this Review, we thus focus on ab initio research of photocatalytic CO2 reduction and comparison with experiments. The most commonly used materials are variously doped TiO2, g-C3N4, and perovskites, which have favorable optical properties on their own. Their efficiency is mostly governed by the band gap, charge separation, and charge transfer. Their characteristics can be improved, and the catalysts can be tailored for a specific use by doping, introduction of defects (such as oxygen vacancies or geometric effects), cocatalysts, or using Z-scheme catalysts. Most theoretical studies focus on the calculations of conduction and valence bands, band gap, and adsorption energies. Some studies try to describe the reaction mechanism. Few studies go beyond the hybrid-functional DFT approach and try to explicitly model the effect of electron excitation. While a theoretical description of the excited states is possible with post-DFT methods, it has yet to be applied to the problem of CO2 photoreduction on a larger scale. We conclude the Review with an outlook on how the current state-of-the-art can be used for improving the existing catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh, D. J., & Fiolhais, C. (1992) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.46.6671 · Cited by 22,269
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh, D. J., & Fiolhais, C. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.4978.2 · Cited by 17,144
Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells
Shockley, W., & Queisser, H. J. (1961) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1736034 · Cited by 13,258
Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I
Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J., & Andersen, O. K. (1991) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.943 · Cited by 7,505
Cited by
Quo vadis multiscale modeling in reaction engineering? – A perspective
Wehinger, G. D., Ambrosetti, M., Cheula, R., Ding, Z.-B., Isoz, M., Kreitz, B., Kuhlmann, K., Kutscherauer, M., Niyogi, K., Poissonnier, J., et al. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.030 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Kovačič, Ž., Likozar, B., & Huš, M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-12-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14984-15007
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111387078
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 165
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photocatalytic CO2Reduction: A Review of Ab Initio Mechanism, Kinetics, and Multiscale Modeling Simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.0c02557
- The paper
- Kovačič, Ž., Likozar, B., & Huš, M. (2020). Photocatalytic CO2Reduction: A Review of Ab Initio Mechanism, Kinetics, and Multiscale Modeling Simulations. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.