Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Essential Role of the Support for Nickel-Based CO2 Methanation Catalysts

Shen, Liang, Xu, Jing, Zhu, Minghui, Han, Yi-Fan·2020·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) methanation reaction not only provides a solution for mitigating the excessive carbon dioxide emissions but also can potentially be employed for the storage and transportation of low-grade energies. A supported nickel-based catalyst is the most promising candidate for the CO 2 methanation reaction. Additionally, understanding the role of the support is essential for the rational design of nickel-based CO 2 methanation catalysts. Herein, we elaborated on the effect of the support on the catalyst structure, CO 2 adsorption, CO 2 activation, methanation mechanism, and deactivation process. Future directions are suggested to elucidate the fundamental aspects of this catalytic system, including the formation mechanism of preferentially exposed facets, the nature of strong metal–support interactions, the balance between support reducibility and basicity, and the CO 2 methanation pathways over nickel-based catalysts with various supports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.0c03471

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shen, L., Xu, J., Zhu, M., & Han, Y.-F.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2020-11-25
Volume
10
Issue
24
Pages
14581-14591
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3107511659
Cited by
386
References
85
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.