Cited by 329Machine Learning in Materials ScienceElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) Dataset and Challenges for Oxide Electrocatalysts

Open access
Tran, Richard, Lan, Janice, Shuaibi, Muhammed, Wood, Brandon M., Goyal, Siddharth, Das, Abhishek, Heras-Domingo, Javier, Kolluru, Adeesh +9 more·2023·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The development of machine learning models for electrocatalysts requires a broad set of training data to enable their use across a wide variety of materials. One class of materials that currently lacks sufficient training data is oxides, which are critical for the development of Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) catalysts. To address this, we developed the Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) dataset, consisting of 62,331 Density Functional Theory (DFT) relaxations (∼9,854,504 single point calculations) across a range of oxide materials, coverages, and adsorbates. We define generalized total energy tasks that enable property prediction beyond adsorption energies; we test baseline performance of several graph neural networks; and we provide predefined dataset splits to establish clear benchmarks for future efforts. In the most general task, GemNet-OC sees a ∼36% improvement in energy predictions when combining the chemically dissimilar Open Catalyst 2020 Data set (OC20) and OC22 datasets via fine-tuning. Similarly, we achieved a ∼19% improvement in total energy predictions on OC20 and a ∼9% improvement in force predictions in OC22 when using joint training. We demonstrate the practical utility of a top performing model by capturing literature adsorption energies and important OER scaling relationships. We expect OC22 to provide an important benchmark for models seeking to incorporate intricate long-range electrostatic and magnetic interactions in oxide surfaces. Data set and baseline models are open sourced, and a public leaderboard is available to encourage continued community developments on the total energy tasks and data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.2c05426

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Universal MLPs cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements but have limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with associated transition states.

    “Two paradigms dominate the MLP field currently: (i) training of universal MLP that cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements, but with limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with the associated transition states, e.g., OC22, CHGNet, and others25–29”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites

    Erlebach, A., Šípka, M., Saha, I., Nachtigall, P., Heard, C. J., & Grajciar, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48609-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

    “Theresultingdatabase contains248,439 structures whichismuch larger compared to datasets used typically to train MLPs for speci fi c systems/reactions (e.g., those with fi xed chemical composition) 30,31 yet much smaller than databases (e.g., OC22) 26 that aim to span the whole periodic table containing millions of DFT d…”
    Method

Authors
Tran, R., Lan, J., Shuaibi, M., Wood, B. M., Goyal, S., Das, A., Heras-Domingo, J., Kolluru, A., Rizvi, A., Shoghi, N., Sriram, A., Therrien, F., Abed, J., Voznyy, O., Sargent, E. H., Ulissi, Z., & Zitnick, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15217, United States
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Toronto Scarborough (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ulissi, Zachary
  • Zitnick, C. Lawrence
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2023-02-16
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
3066-3084
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321085451
Cited by
329
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 3
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
oxygen evolution reaction, adsorption energy, graph neural networks, fine-tuning, benchmarking, magnetic interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review