The Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) Dataset and Challenges for Oxide Electrocatalysts
Open accessAbstract
The development of machine learning models for electrocatalysts requires a broad set of training data to enable their use across a wide variety of materials. One class of materials that currently lacks sufficient training data is oxides, which are critical for the development of Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) catalysts. To address this, we developed the Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) dataset, consisting of 62,331 Density Functional Theory (DFT) relaxations (∼9,854,504 single point calculations) across a range of oxide materials, coverages, and adsorbates. We define generalized total energy tasks that enable property prediction beyond adsorption energies; we test baseline performance of several graph neural networks; and we provide predefined dataset splits to establish clear benchmarks for future efforts. In the most general task, GemNet-OC sees a ∼36% improvement in energy predictions when combining the chemically dissimilar Open Catalyst 2020 Data set (OC20) and OC22 datasets via fine-tuning. Similarly, we achieved a ∼19% improvement in total energy predictions on OC20 and a ∼9% improvement in force predictions in OC22 when using joint training. We demonstrate the practical utility of a top performing model by capturing literature adsorption energies and important OER scaling relationships. We expect OC22 to provide an important benchmark for models seeking to incorporate intricate long-range electrostatic and magnetic interactions in oxide surfaces. Data set and baseline models are open sourced, and a public leaderboard is available to encourage continued community developments on the total energy tasks and data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Universal MLPs cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements but have limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with associated transition states.
“Two paradigms dominate the MLP field currently: (i) training of universal MLP that cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements, but with limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with the associated transition states, e.g., OC22, CHGNet, and others25–29”
From A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094 · see citing works
The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis
Dau, H., Limberg, C., Reier, T., Risch, M., Roggan, S., & Strasser, P. (2010) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201000126 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction
Sholl, D. S., & Steckel, J. A. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470447710 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites
Erlebach, A., Šípka, M., Saha, I., Nachtigall, P., Heard, C. J., & Grajciar, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48609-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Theresultingdatabase contains248,439 structures whichismuch larger compared to datasets used typically to train MLPs for speci fi c systems/reactions (e.g., those with fi xed chemical composition) 30,31 yet much smaller than databases (e.g., OC22) 26 that aim to span the whole periodic table containing millions of DFT d…”
Method
- Authors
- Tran, R., Lan, J., Shuaibi, M., Wood, B. M., Goyal, S., Das, A., Heras-Domingo, J., Kolluru, A., Rizvi, A., Shoghi, N., Sriram, A., Therrien, F., Abed, J., Voznyy, O., Sargent, E. H., Ulissi, Z., & Zitnick, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15217, United States
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Toronto Scarborough (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ulissi, Zachary
- Zitnick, C. Lawrence
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-02-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3066-3084
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321085451
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 109 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 24.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- oxygen evolution reaction, adsorption energy, graph neural networks, fine-tuning, benchmarking, magnetic interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review