Cited by 55Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced battery technologies researchCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Asymmetrical Ru–O–Mn Bridge Active Sites Fully Decouple Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysis for Rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries

Zhou, Tao, Wang, Wenchao, Luo, Hao, Wu, Yifan, Xia, Ruiqin, Zhang, Yingchuan, Li, Zijing, Jia, Guangri +3 more·2024·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

A high-performance bifunctional electrocatalyst toward oxygen evolution/reduction reactions (OER/ORR) is critical for rechargeable zinc-air batteries (ZABs). However, the binding energy scaling of reaction intermediates impedes full optimization of the electrocatalyst, leading to poor bifunctional activity and low efficiency. Here, the OER/ORR cycles are effectively decoupled over a Mn 0.3 Ru 0.7 O 2 catalyst by asymmetrical “Ru–O–Mn” dual-bridge active sites, with OER intermediates coordinated over the “Ru–O” site and ORR intermediates over the “Mn” site. Due to the metal–oxygen covalency competition between the two sites, lattice oxygen-mediated O–O coupling on the Ru–O site is promoted, whereas the overbinding of *OOH on the Mn site is mitigated to enhance the OER and ORR, respectively, leading to a low ORR–OER potential gap of 0.63 V. The Mn 0.3 Ru 0.7 O 2 -assembled ZAB exhibits a high-power density of 179 mW cm –2 and a long lifespan of over 800 h, outperforming the [Pt/C||RuO 2 ] benchmark. These findings rationalize the design of Ru–O–Mn dual-bridge sites for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis and provide a strategy to enhance the ORR/OER bifunctionality for high-performance ZABs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.4c01728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, T., Wang, W., Luo, H., Wu, Y., Xia, R., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Jia, G., Zhang, T., Peng, H., & Guo, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Zhengxiao
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2024-06-04
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
9313-9322
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399332324
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2020B0101370003)
  • European Commission (E-HKU703/23, E-HKU704/19)
  • University Research Committee, University of Hong Kong
  • University Grants Committee (E-HKU703/23, E-HKU704/19, T23-713/22-R)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22306095)
  • Environment and Conservation Fund (ECF 2021-152)
  • Hong Kong Quantum AI Lab Ltd.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
rechargeable zinc-air batteries, bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts, oxygen evolution reaction, oxygen reduction reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review