The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOFs-Templated Co@Pd Core–Shell NPs Embedded in N-Doped Carbon Matrix with Superior Hydrogenation Activities
Abstract
Although MOFs supporting noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) have been widely used in heterogeneous catalysis, they are still limited in catalytic efficiency on a per-noble-metal-atom basis. Here we developed a MOFs-templated strategy to non-noble metal @noble metal core–shell nanocatalysts, which could far surpass the traditional MOFs supporting noble NPs in catalytic properties, by using MOFs-derived metal NPs as sacrificial templates to reduce noble metal ions via galvanic replacement reaction. As a model system, Co@Pd core–shell NPs embedded in the N-doped carbon matrix (Co@Pd/NC) were synthesized with an average size of ca. 9.4 nm and a ultrathin Pd shell by using ZIF-67 and Pd(NO 3 ) 2 as the precursor and Pd source, respectively. The highly exposed Pd atom on Co nanoparticles made it an attractive catalyst with high efficiency. When being used in the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene, the Co@Pd/NC exhibited an unprecedented high activity over Pd-based catalysts, yielding 98% conversion after 45 min reaction, which was far more active than the pristine ZIF-67 and MIL-101 supporting Pd NPs (with 40% and 3% conversion after 90 min reaction, respectively) under identical conditions, suggesting its overwhelmingly better performance than MOFs supporting noble NPs. We anticipated that this strategy would form the basis for developing a new class of MOF-templated core–shell nanocatalyst with potential applications in numerous catalytic reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Wang, H., Maiyalagan, T., & Wang, X. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200652y · Cited by 3,618
Chen, L., Xu, C., Du, R., Mao, Y., Xue, C., Chen, L., Qu, L., Zhang, J., & Yi, T. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c4ta06764a · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Cited by
Metal–organic framework-derived porous materials for catalysis
Chen, Y.-Z., Zhang, R., Jiao, L., & Jiang, H.-L. (2018) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.02.008 · Cited by 1,015
Metal organic frameworks as precursors for the manufacture of advanced catalytic materials
Oar-Arteta, L., Wezendonk, T., Sun, X., Kapteijn, F., & Gascon, J. (2017) · Materials Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/c7qm00007c · Cited by 361
Chen, H., Shen, K., Mao, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03270 · Cited by 341
Self-citationZhao, S.-N., Song, X.-Z., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.02.010 · Cited by 336
Li, M., Xu, F., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Catalysis Science & Technology · doi:10.1039/c6cy00544f · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, K., Chen, L., Long, J., Zhong, W., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5264-5271
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2511835098
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.