The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bimetal–Organic Framework Self-Adjusted Synthesis of Support-Free Nonprecious Electrocatalysts for Efficient Oxygen Reduction
Open accessAbstract
The development of low-cost catalysts with oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity superior to that of Pt for fuel cells is highly desirable but remains challenging. Herein, we report a bimetal–organic framework (bi-MOF) self-adjusted synthesis of support-free porous Co–N–C nanopolyhedron electrocatalysts by pyrolysis of a Zn/Co bi-MOF without any post-treatments. The presence of initial Zn forms a spatial isolation of Co that suppresses its sintering during pyrolysis, and Zn evaporation also promotes the surface area of the resultant catalysts. The composition, morphology, and hence ORR activity of Co–N–C could be tuned by the Zn/Co ratio. The optimal Co–N–C exhibited remarkable ORR activity with a half-wave potential of 0.871 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (30 mV more positive than that of commercial 20 wt % Pt/C) and a kinetic current density of 39.3 mA cm –2 at 0.80 V versus RHE (3.1 times that of Pt/C) in 0.1 M KOH, and excellent stability and methanol tolerance. It also demonstrated ORR activity comparable to and stability much higher than those of Pt/C in acidic and neutral electrolytes. Various characterization techniques, including X-ray absorption spectroscopy, revealed that the superior activity and strong stability of Co–N–C originated from the intense interaction between Co and N, the high content of ORR active pyridinic and pyrrolic N, and the large specific surface area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Zhong, H., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Xing, W., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201408990 · Cited by 938
Sun, Y., Liu, C., Grauer, D. C., Yano, J., Long, J. R., Yang, P., & Chang, C. J. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4094764 · Cited by 556
Self-citation
Cited by
Wang, X. X., Swihart, M. T., & Wu, G. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0304-9 · Cited by 1,174
Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall and Hybrid Water Splitting
Quan, L., Jiang, H., Mei, G., Sun, Y., & You, B. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00332 · Cited by 874
Self-citationYang, L., Zeng, X., Wang, W., & Cao, D. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201704537 · Cited by 772
Sa, Y. J., Seo, D.-J., Woo, J., Lim, J. T., Cheon, J. Y., Yang, S. Y., Lee, J. M., Kang, D., Shin, T. J., Shin, H. S., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b09470 · Cited by 746
Guan, B. Y., Yu, X. Y., Wu, H. B., & Lou, X. W. (. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703614 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- You, B., Jiang, N., Sheng, M., Drisdell, W. S., Yano, J., & Sun, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-10-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7068-7076
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2281239332
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.