Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanostructured LaNiO3 Perovskite Electrocatalyst for Enhanced Urea Oxidation

Forslund, Robin P., Mefford, J. Tyler, Hardin, William G., Alexander, Caleb T., Johnston, Keith P., Stevenson, Keith J.·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Urea electrooxidation has attracted considerable interest as an alternative anodic reaction in the electrochemical generation of hydrogen due to both the lower electrochemical potential required to drive the reaction and also the possibility of eliminating a potentially harmful substance from wastewater during hydrogen fuel production. Nickel and nickel-containing oxides have shown activities comparable to those of precious-metal catalysts for the electrooxidation of urea in alkaline conditions. Herein, we investigate the use of nanostructured LaNiO 3 perovskite supported on Vulcan carbon XC-72 as an electrocatalyst. This catalyst exhibits an exceptionally high mass activity of ca. 371 mA mg ox –1 and specific activity of 2.25 A mg –1 cm ox –2 for the electrooxidation of urea in 1 M KOH, demonstrating the potential applications of Ni-based perovskites for direct urea fuel cells and low-energy hydrogen production. While LaNiO 3 is shown to be stable at low overpotentials, through in-depth mechanistic studies the catalyst surface was observed to restructure and there was apparent CO 2 poisoning of the LaNiO 3 upon extended cycling, a result that may be extended to other Ni-based systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b00487

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Forslund, R. P., Mefford, J. T., Hardin, W. G., Alexander, C. T., Johnston, K. P., & Stevenson, K. J.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-07-06
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
5044-5051
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469103723
Cited by
264
References
18
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.