Cited by 270Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen ReductionCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Operando Raman Spectroscopy of Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide (MoSx) during the Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: Identification of Sulfur Atoms as Catalytically Active Sites for H+ Reduction

Deng, Yilin, Ting, Louisa Rui Lin, Neo, Perlin Hui Lin, Zhang, Yin-Jia, Peterson, Andrew A, Yeo, Boon Siang·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Amorphous molybdenum sulfide (MoS x ) is currently being developed as an economically viable and efficient catalyst for the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). An important yet unsolved problem in this ongoing effort is the identification of its catalytically active sites for proton reduction. In this work, cyclic voltammetry (CV), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Raman spectroscopy were used to investigate the catalytically active sites and structural evolution of MoS x films during HER in 1 M HClO 4 electrolyte. Transformation of anodically deposited MoS x ( x ≈ 3) to a structure with MoS 2 composition during the cathodic sweep of a CV was demonstrated using XPS and operando Raman spectroscopy. Interestingly, a Raman peak at 2530 cm –1 was recorded at potentials relevant to H 2 evolution, which we ascribed to the S–H stretching vibration of MoS x –H moieties. This assignment was corroborated by H/D isotope exchange experiments. Mo–H (or Mo–D) stretching vibrations were not observed, which thus allowed us to rule out Mo centers as catalytic sites for proton reduction to H 2 . Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on a variety of MoS x structures to capture the heterogeneous nature of amorphous materials and corroborated the assignments of the observed vibrational frequencies. On the basis of these experimental measurements and quantum chemical simulations, we have for the first time directly pinpointed the sulfur atoms in amorp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b01848

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Deng, Y., Ting, L. R. L., Neo, P. H. L., Zhang, Y.-J., Peterson, A. A., & Yeo, B. S.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Yeo, Boon Siang
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-10-18
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
7790-7798
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2539389171
Cited by
270
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 14
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-15-1-2223)
  • Academic Research Fund, National University of Singapore (R-143-000-587-112)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
amorphous molybdenum sulfide, MoSx, electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution, catalytic site, sulfur atom, operando Raman spectroscopy, anodic deposition, MoS2, H/D isotope exchange, density functional theory, hydrogen evolution catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review