The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Inverse Michaelis–Menten Approach for Interfacial Enzyme Kinetics
Abstract
Interfacial enzyme reactions are ubiquitous both in vivo and in technical applications, but analysis of their kinetics remains controversial. In particular, it is unclear whether conventional Michaelis–Menten theory, which requires a large excess of substrate, can be applied. Here, an extensive experimental study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose indeed showed that the conventional approach had a limited applicability. Instead we argue that, unlike bulk reactions, interfacial enzyme catalysis may reach a steady-state condition in the opposite experimental limit, where the concentration of enzyme far exceeded the molar concentration of accessible surface sites. Under this condition, an “inverse Michaelis–Menten equation”, where the roles of enzyme and substrate had been swapped, proved to be readily applicable. We suggest that this inverted approach provides a general tool for kinetic analyses of interfacial enzyme reactions and that its analogy to established theory provides a bridge to the accumulated understanding of steady-state enzyme kinetics. Finally, we show that the ratio of parameters from conventional and inverted Michaelis–Menten analysis reveals the density of enzyme attack sites on the substrate surface as probed by one specific enzyme. This density, which is an analogue to a molar substrate concentration for interfacial reactions, was shown to vary strongly even among related enzymes. This difference reflects how the enzyme discriminates between local differences in surface structure on the substrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Cited by
Mechanism-Based Design of Efficient PET Hydrolases
Wei, R., von Haugwitz, G., Pfaff, L., Mican, J., Badenhorst, C. P. S., Liu, W., Weber, G., Austin, H. P., Bednar, D., Damborsky, J., et al. (2022) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c05856 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Kari, J., Andersen, M., Borch, K., & Westh, P.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4904-4914
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2626867740
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.