Cited by 92CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Cobalt Spinel Nanocubes on N-Doped Graphene: A Synergistic Hybrid Electrocatalyst for the Highly Selective Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid

Open access
Sekar, Pandiaraj, Calvillo, Laura, Tubaro, Cristina, Baron, Marco, Pokle, Anuj, Carraro, Francesco, Martucci, Alex, Agnoli, Stefano·2017·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Carbon dioxide reduction into useful chemical products is a key technology to address urgent climate and energy challenges. In this study, a nanohybrid made by Co3O4 and graphene is proposed as an efficient electrocatalyst for the selective reduction of CO2 to formate at low overpotential. A comparison between samples with different metal oxide to carbon ratios and with or without doping of the graphene moiety indicates that the most active catalyst is formed by highly dispersed and crystalline nanocubes exposing {001} oriented surfaces, whereas the nitrogen doping is critical to obtain a controlled morphology and to facilitate a topotactic transformation during electrocatalytic conditions to CoO, which results in the true active phase. The nanohybrid made up by intermediate loading of Co3O4 supported on nitrogen-doped graphene is the most active catalyst, being able to produce 3.14 mmol of formate in 8 h at −0.95 V vs SCE with a Faradaic efficiency of 83%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b02166

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Lin, S.; Diercks, C. S.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Kornienko, N.; Nichols, E. M.; Zhao, Y.; Paris, A. R.; Kim, D.; Yang, P.; Yaghi, O. M.; Chang, C. J. Science 2015, 349, 1208-1213.
  2. Kuhl, K. P.; Cave, E. R.; Abram, D. N.; Jaramillo, T. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7050.
  3. Costentin, C.; Passard, G.; Robert, M.; Saveant, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11821-11829.
  4. Quadrelli, E. A.; Centi, G.; Duplan, J.-L.; Perathoner, S. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1194-1215.
  5. Kuhl, K. P.; Hatsukade, T.; Cave, E. R.; Abram, D. N.; Kibsgaard, J.; Jaramillo, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14107-14113.
  6. Zhu, D. D.; Liu, J. L.; Qiao, S. Z. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3423- 3452.
  7. Yang, N.; Waldvogel, S. R.; Jiang, X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28357-28371.
  8. Lee, S. Y.; Lim, S. Y.; Seo, D.; Lee, J.-Y.; Chung, T. D. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502207.
  9. Sen, S.; Liu, D.; Palmore, G. T. R. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3091- 3095.
  10. Li, F.; Zhao, S.-F.; Chen, L.; Khan, A.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Zhang, J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 216-223.
  11. Rosen, B. A.; Salehi-Khojin, A.; Thorson, M. R.; Zhu, W.; Whipple, D. T.; Kenis, P. J. A.; Masel, R. I. Science 2011, 334, 643- 644.
  12. Kim, B.; Hillman, F.; Ariyoshi, M.; Fujikawa, S.; Kenis, P. J. A. J. Power Sources 2016, 312, 192-198.
  13. Verma, S.; Lu, X.; Ma, S.; Masel, R. I.; Kenis, P. J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 7075-7084.
  14. Kortlever, R.; Peters, I.; Koper, S.; Koper, M. T. M. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3916-3923.
  15. Zhu, W.; Michalsky, R.; Metin, O.; Lv, H.; Guo, S.; Wright, C. J.; Sun, X.; Peterson, A. A.; Sun, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16833- 16836.
  16. Gao, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Miao, S.; Yang, F.; Wang, G.; Wang, J.; Bao, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4288-4291.
  17. Hall, A. S.; Yoon, Y.; Wuttig, A.; Surendranath, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14834-14837.
  18. Feng, X.; Jiang, K.; Fan, S.; Kanan, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4606-4609.
  19. Oh, S.; Gallagher, J. R.; Miller, J. T.; Surendranath, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1820-1823.
  20. Passard, G.; Ullman, A. M.; Brodsky, C. N.; Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2925-2928.
  21. Manna, P.; Debgupta, J.; Bose, S.; Das, S. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2425-2430.
  22. Singh, S. K.; Dhavale, V. M.; Kurungot, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21138-21149.
  23. Ramsundar, R. M.; Debgupta, J.; Pillai, V. K.; Joy, P. A. Electrocatalysis 2015, 6, 331-340.
  24. Jin, H.; Wang, J.; Su, D.; Wei, Z.; Pang, Z.; Wang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2688-2694.
  25. Hamdani, M.; Singh, R.; Chartier, P. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2010, 5, 556.
  26. Xie, X.; Shen, W. Nanoscale 2009, 1, 50-60.
  27. Gao, S.; Jiao, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Hu, Q.; Zu, X.; Yang, F.; Yang, S.; Liang, L.; Wu, J.; Xie, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 698-702.
  28. Gao, S.; Lin, Y.; Jiao, X.; Sun, Y.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, D.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y. Nature 2016, 529, 68-71.
  29. Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 780-786.
  30. Shearer, C. J.; Cherevan, A.; Eder, A. D. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2295-2318.
  31. Lei, F.; Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, K.; Liang, L.; Yao, T.; Pan, B.; Wei, S.; Xie, Y. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12697.
  32. Spilarewicz-Stanek, K.; Kisielewska, A.; Ginter, J.; Baluszynska, K.; Piwonski, I. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 60056-60067.
  33. Sreekanth, N.; Nazrulla, M. A.; Vineesh, T. V.; Sailaja, K.; Phani, K. L. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 16061-16064.
  34. Wang, R.; Xu, C.; Sun, J.; Gao, L. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 7171.
  35. Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Dai, S.; Qiao, S. Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2072-2078.
  36. Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Sharma, P. P.; Yadav, R. M.; Ma, L.; Yang, Y.; Zou, X.; Zhou, X.-D.; Vajtai, R.; Yakobson, B. I.; Lou, J.; Ajayan, P. M. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 466-470.
  37. Xu, J.; Kan, Y.; Huang, R.; Zhang, B.; Wang, B.; Wu, K. H.; Lin, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, Q.; Centi, G.; Su, D. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1085- 1089.
  38. Breslow, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 146-153.
  39. Hu, X.-M.; Rønne, M. H.; Pedersen, S. U.; Skrydstrup, T.; Daasbjerg, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6468.
  40. Behar, D.; Dhanasekaran, T.; Neta, P.; Hosten, C. M.; Ejeh, D.; Hambright, P.; Fujita, E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 2870-2877.
  41. Kornienko, N.; Zhao, Y.; Kley, C. S.; Zhu, C.; Kim, D.; Lin, S.; Chang, C. J.; Yaghi, O. M.; Yang, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14129-14135.
  42. Cheng, M.-J.; Kwon, Y.; Head-Gordon, M.; Bell, A. T. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 21345-21352.
  43. Yao, S. A.; Ruther, R. E.; Zhang, L.; Franking, R. A.; Hamers, R. J.; Berry, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15632-15635.
  44. Morlaneś, N.; Takanabe, K.; Rodionov, V. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 3092-3095.
  45. Yu, X.-Y.; Meng, Q.-Q.; Luo, T.; Jia, Y.; Sun, B.; Li, Q.-X.; Liu, J.-L.; Huang, X.-J. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2886.
  46. Geng, B.; Zhan, F.; Fang, C.; Yu, N. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4977-4984.
  47. Carraro, F.; Calvillo, L.; Cattelan, M.; Favaro, M.; Righetto, M.; Nappini, S.; Pís, I.; Celorrio, V.; Fermín, D. J.; Martucci, A.; Agnoli, S.; Granozzi, G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25685-25692.
  48. Singh, S. K.; Dhavale, V. M.; Kurungot, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 442-451.
  49. Hadjiev, V.; Iliev, M.; Vergilov, I. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1988, 21, L199.
  50. Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Martens, W. N.; Frost, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 111-119.
  51. Zhang, C.; Wang, B.; Shen, X.; Liu, J.; Kong, X.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Yang, D.; Dong, A.; Peng, Z. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 503-510.
  52. Favaro, M.; Agnoli, S.; Di Valentin, C.; Mattevi, C.; Cattelan, M.; Artiglia, L.; Magnano, E.; Bondino, F.; Nappini, S.; Granozzi, G. Carbon 2014, 68, 319-329.
  53. Ganguly, A.; Sharma, S.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Hamilton, J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17009-17019.
  54. Xing, Z.; Ju, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Qiang, Y.; Qian, Y. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26146.
  55. Biesinger, M. C.; Payne, B. P.; Grosvenor, A. P.; Lau, L. W.; Gerson, A. R.; Smart, R. S. C. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717-2730.
  56. Tripathy, S. K.; Christy, M.; Park, N.-H.; Suh, E.-K.; Anand, S.; Yu, Y.-T. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 1006-1009.
  57. Wang, Z.-L.; Li, C.; Yamauchi, Y. Nano Today 2016, 11, 373- 391.
  58. Gupta, K.; Bersani, M.; Darr, J. A. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13786-13794.
  59. Zhang, S.; Kang, P.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1734-1737.
  60. Gragnaniello, L.; Agnoli, S.; Parteder, G.; Barolo, A.; Bondino, F.; Allegretti, F.; Surnev, S.; Granozzi, G.; Netzer, F. P. Surf. Sci. 2010, 604, 2002-2011.
  61. Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Gong, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11326.
  62. Kortlever, R.; Shen, J.; Schouten, J. J. P.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 4073-4082.
  63. Min, X.; Kanan, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4701-4708.
  64. Humphrey, J. J. L.; Plana, D.; Celorrio, V.; Sadasivan, S.; Tooze, R. P.; Rodríguez, P.; Fermín, D. J. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 952.
  65. Celorrio, V.; Dann, E.; Calvillo, L.; Morgan, D. J.; Hall, S. R.; Fermín, D. J. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 283.
  66. Celorrio, V.; Calvillo, L.; Dann, E.; Granozzi, G.; Aguadero, A.; Kramer, D.; Russel, A. E.; Fermín, D. J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 7231.
  67. Wang, J.; Zhou, J.; Hu, Y.; Regier, T. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 926-934.
  68. Lee, C. H.; Kanan, M. W. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 465-469.
  69. Nam, K. M.; Shim, J. H.; Han, D. W.; Kwon, H. S.; Kang, Y. M.; Li, Y.; Song, H.; Seo, W. S.; Park, J. T. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4446- 4454.
  70. Yadav, V. S. K.; Purkait, M. K. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 7348- 7354.
  71. Choi, S. Y.; Jeong, S. K.; Kim, H. J.; Baek, I.-H.; Park, K. T. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1311-1318.
  72. Marcano, D. C.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Berlin, J. M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L. B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J. M. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806-4814.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekar, P., Calvillo, L., Tubaro, C., Baron, M., Pokle, A., Carraro, F., Martucci, A., & Agnoli, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Agnoli, Stefano
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
7695-7703
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758999824
Cited by
92
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo (NA)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (2015K7FZLH, RBFR128BEC)
  • Università degli Studi di Padova (CPDA128318/12)
  • Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
CO2 reduction, formate production, cobalt spinel, Co3O4 nanocubes, nitrogen-doped graphene, electrocatalysts, topotactic transformation, Faradaic efficiency, hybrid nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review