Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of Catalytic Performance to the Aluminum Siting of Acidic Zeolites in the Conversion of Methanol to Olefins, Viewed via a Comparison between ZSM-5 and ZSM-11

Wang, Sen, Wang, Pengfei, Qin, Zhangfeng, Chen, Yanyan, Dong, Mei, Li, Junfen, Zhang, Kan, Liu, Ping, Wang, Jianguo, Fan, Weibin·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 zeolites are similar in their crystalline framework structure, acidity, morphology, and textual properties but considerably different in their catalytic performance for conversion of methanol to olefins (MTO). Such an unexpected but exciting finding was extensively explored by various techniques and density functional theory calculations. A detailed investigation shows that it is the different Al distribution in the ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 framework that causes the significant difference in MTO catalytic performance. In ZSM-5, Al atoms are enriched in the intersection, whereas in ZSM-11, the Al atoms are concentrated in the straight 10-membered ring channel. The acid sites located in the intersection enhance the arene-based cycle that generates more ethene, alkanes, and aromatics. Nevertheless, these hydrocarbon molecules can easily diffuse out of the zeolite channel, hence retarding the deposition of carbonaceous materials and increasing catalytic stability. However, the acid sites located in the straight channel promote the alkene-based cycle, thus preferentially generating higher olefins that could transform into aromatics and carbon precursors that have difficulty in diffusing out of ZSM-11. The fast accumulation of coke species leads to its short catalytic lifetime. Via a shift of the Al atoms of ZSM-11 from the straight channel to the intersection by incorporation of appropriate amounts of B or alteration of silica and alumina sources and addition of sodium cations, its MTO catalytic performance (activity, selectivity, and stability) becomes highly comparable to that of ZSM-5. The insights attained in this work not only help to clarify the relationship of Al siting in zeolite with its MTO catalytic performance but also provide a cue for improving the catalytic properties of zeolites by regulating the sitings of active sites in lattice sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b01054

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Wang, P., Qin, Z., Chen, Y., Dong, M., Li, J., Zhang, K., Liu, P., Wang, J., & Fan, W.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-05-04
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
5485-5505
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799343821
Cited by
252
References
3
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.