The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relation of Catalytic Performance to the Aluminum Siting of Acidic Zeolites in the Conversion of Methanol to Olefins, Viewed via a Comparison between ZSM-5 and ZSM-11
Abstract
ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 zeolites are similar in their crystalline framework structure, acidity, morphology, and textual properties but considerably different in their catalytic performance for conversion of methanol to olefins (MTO). Such an unexpected but exciting finding was extensively explored by various techniques and density functional theory calculations. A detailed investigation shows that it is the different Al distribution in the ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 framework that causes the significant difference in MTO catalytic performance. In ZSM-5, Al atoms are enriched in the intersection, whereas in ZSM-11, the Al atoms are concentrated in the straight 10-membered ring channel. The acid sites located in the intersection enhance the arene-based cycle that generates more ethene, alkanes, and aromatics. Nevertheless, these hydrocarbon molecules can easily diffuse out of the zeolite channel, hence retarding the deposition of carbonaceous materials and increasing catalytic stability. However, the acid sites located in the straight channel promote the alkene-based cycle, thus preferentially generating higher olefins that could transform into aromatics and carbon precursors that have difficulty in diffusing out of ZSM-11. The fast accumulation of coke species leads to its short catalytic lifetime. Via a shift of the Al atoms of ZSM-11 from the straight channel to the intersection by incorporation of appropriate amounts of B or alteration of silica and alumina sources and addition of sodium cations, its MTO catalytic performance (activity, selectivity, and stability) becomes highly comparable to that of ZSM-5. The insights attained in this work not only help to clarify the relationship of Al siting in zeolite with its MTO catalytic performance but also provide a cue for improving the catalytic properties of zeolites by regulating the sitings of active sites in lattice sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitatively Probing the Al Distribution in Zeolites
Vjunov, A., Fulton, J. L., Huthwelker, T., Pin, S., Mei, D., Schenter, G. K., Govind, N., Camaioni, D. M., Hu, J. Z., & Lercher, J. A. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja501361v · Cited by 251
On the Preferential Location of Al and Proton Siting in Zeolites: A Computational and Infrared Study
Sastre, G., Fornes, V., & Corma, A. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp013189p · Cited by 93
Ab Initio Simulation of the Acid Sites at the External Surface of Zeolite Beta
Rey, J., Raybaud, P., & Chizallet, C. (2017) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201700080 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Regulation of the Si/Al ratios and Al distributions of zeolites and their impact on properties
Li, J., Gao, M., Yan, W., & Yu, J. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d2sc06010h · Cited by 404
Self-citationApplications of Zeolites to C1 Chemistry: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities
Zhang, Q., Yu, J., & Corma, A. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002927 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Wang, P., Qin, Z., Chen, Y., Dong, M., Li, J., Zhang, K., Liu, P., Wang, J., & Fan, W.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-05-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5485-5505
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799343821
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.