Cited by 168Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFuel Cells and Related Materials

Amorphous multi-elements electrocatalysts with tunable bifunctionality toward overall water splitting

Abstract

Economically producing hydrogen via electrocatalytic water splitting requires highly efficient and low-cost catalysts and scalable synthetic strategies. Herein, we present the preparation of hierarchically structured multi-elements water splitting electrocatalysts consisting of Fe, Co, Ni, S, P, and O with a one-step electrodeposition method. By tuning of the non-metal compositions of the catalysts, the electrochemical performances of the catalysts for both the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in 1 M KOH can be rationally modified, respectively. Under the optimum conditions, current densities of 100 and 1000 mA cm –2 were obtained at overpotentials of only 135 and 264 mV on the HER catalyst and 258 and 360 mV on the OER catalyst, respectively. When the best-performing HER and OER catalysts were assembled in a two-electrode system for overall water splitting, a current density of 10 mA cm –2 could be obtained under a cell voltage of 1.46 V with long-term durability. As far as we know, this is among the lowest voltages ever reported for a two-electrode electrolyzer based upon earth-abundant elements. Moreover, the catalysts can be facilely assembled on commercially available Ni mesh and demonstrate even higher performance, indicating their great potential for scaled-up water electrolysis. We further demonstrate that S and P play different and pivotal roles in modifying the apparent and intrinsic electrocatalytic activity of the as-prepar…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b01839

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Ma, W., Ding, C., Xu, Z., Wang, H., Zong, X., & Li, C.
Affiliations
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zong, Xu
  • Li, Can
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-09-14
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
9926-9935
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890916067
Cited by
168
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China National Petroleum Corporation
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2017YFA0204804)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21573219)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB17000000)
  • Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
amorphous electrocatalysts, bifunctional electrocatalysts, overall water splitting, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrodeposition, earth-abundant catalysts, two-electrode electrolyzer, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review