The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revealing the Size Effect of Platinum Cocatalyst for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution on TiO2 Support: A DFT Study
Abstract
In heterogeneous catalysis metal particle morphology and size can influence markedly the activity, both in heat-driven and in electro-photocatalytic conditions. Because of the intimate coupling between the photoelectron transfer and the surface catalytic reaction, it has been challenging to determine the optimal metal particle size in photocatalytic reactions. Here, we utilize ab initio molecular dynamics and hybrid density functional theory calculations to reveal the size-dependent activity of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) over Pt/TiO 2 photocatalysts. By supporting four different Pt particles Pt 5, Pt 8, Pt 13, and Pt 19 on anatase TiO 2 (101), we determine the optimal geometries, the electronic structures, the photoelectron-transfer efficiency, and the surface hydrogen coupling reaction activity of these composite materials. We demonstrate that very small Pt clusters with less than two atomic layers are efficient photoelectron collectors from TiO 2 bulk due to their low highest occupied molecular orbital level with respect to the oxide conduction band; by contrast, larger particles with more than two Pt layers are the active site for hydrogen coupling to catalyze HER. Our results suggest that quasi two-Pt-layer particles, corresponding to ∼1 nm size, are the best catalyst for photocatalytic HER. Compared to heat-driven and electrocatalysis, we conclude that photocatalysis prefers even smaller metal particles to enhance photoelectron transfer, which should be a general guideline for designing optimal photocatalysts in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting
Zou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00448e · Cited by 5,955
Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution
Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2006) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1752 · Cited by 4,097
Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis
Yang, J., Wang, D., Han, H., & Li, C. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300227e · Cited by 2,848
Self-citationSurface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Kampouri, S., & Stylianou, K. C. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b00332 · Cited by 298
Tang, Y., Jia, X., Guo, Y., Geng, Z., Wang, C., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Guo, W., Tan, X., Yu, T., et al. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202203827 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Liu, Z.-P., & Yang, W.-M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-06-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 7270-7278
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809488959
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.