Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 to Isoparaffins over Fe-Based Multifunctional Catalysts

Wei, Jian, Yao, Ruwei, Ge, Qingjie, Wen, Zhiyong, Ji, Xuewei, Fang, Chuanyan, Zhang, Jixin, Xu, Hengyong, Sun, Jian·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Direct conversion of CO 2 into isoparaffins, ideal clean hydrocarbon fuel components, would be an eco-friendly way of mitigating CO 2 emissions and replacing fossil fuels. Herein, we realize a one-step high-yield synthesis of isoparaffins from CO 2 hydrogenation, catalyzed by a multifunctional Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HMCM-22 catalyst. A selectivity of 82% among hydrocarbons was achieved for C 4+ hydrocarbons, of which isoparaffins could account for 74%, while CO selectivity was as low as 17% at a CO 2 conversion of 26%. The high yield to isoparaffins was derived owing to well matching of three tandem reactions comprising reverse water–gas shift, C–C coupling and isomerization. Unique pore structure and appropriate Brønsted acid properties of HMCM-22 effectively suppressed aromatization, while promoting isomerization. Coke deposition inside the micropores of HMCM-22 causes the decline of isoparaffin yield without changing the total yield of heavy hydrocarbons. Both the physicochemical properties and catalytic performances of the catalysts could still keep their original levels after several reaction-regeneration cycles, indicating a promising potential application in the future commercialization process of CO 2 hydrogenation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b02267

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Wei, J., Yao, R., Ge, Q., Wen, Z., Ji, X., Fang, C., Zhang, J., Xu, H., & Sun, J.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
9958-9967
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892112811
Cited by
214
References
1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.