Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sabatier Principle for Interfacial (Heterogeneous) Enzyme Catalysis

Kari, Jeppe, Olsen, Johan P., Jensen, Kenneth, Badino, Silke F., Krogh, Kristian B. R. M., Borch, Kim, Westh, Peter·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The Sabatier principle states that optimal catalysis occurs when interactions between catalyst and substrate are of intermediary strength. Although qualitative in nature, this concept has proven extremely useful within (nonbiochemical) heterogeneous catalysis. In the current work, we show that the principle may be applied to an interfacial enzyme reaction. Specifically, we studied the breakdown of cellulose by different cellulases (wild types and variants) and found that the results could be rationalized in so-called volcano plots that are emblematic of the principle. This implies that the rate of the complex enzymatic reaction can be described by a single parameter (binding strength), and we show how this may help elucidating e.g. rate-controlling steps and relationships of substrate load and enzymatic efficacy. On a more general level, we propose that the Sabatier principle may be widely applicable to interfacial enzyme processes and hence open an avenue to the application within biocatalysis of some of the principles and practices originally developed for heterogeneous catalysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b03547

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kari, J., Olsen, J. P., Jensen, K., Badino, S. F., Krogh, K. B. R. M., Borch, K., & Westh, P.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-11-12
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
11966-11972
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901815690
Cited by
223
References
1
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.